Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Problema žestkoj designacii v semantike imen sobstvennyx
Ekaterina Vostrikova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No. 4 (Vol. 34)

The paper is devoted to the defense of the metalinguistic approach to the semantics of proper names. The author considers Kripke’s arguments against descriptivism and the possibilities of metalinguistic approach to answer those arguments. She argues that definite descriptions can be turned into rigid designators by the variables for possible world, which have an independent motivation in semantics.

reference, proper names, formal semantics, metalinguistic approach

Anderson J. The Grammar of Names, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Bach K. Giorgione was so-called because of his name, Philosophical Perspectives 16. 2002: 73-103.

Burge T. Reference and proper names. In  Journal of Philosophy. 70(14): 425–39, 1973.

Devitt M. The case for referential descriptions. In Marga Reimer and Anne Bezuidenhout, eds. Description and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Elbourne P. Situations and individuals. The MIT Press, 2006.

Geurts B. Good news about the description theory of names. In Journal of semantics. 14. 319-348. 1997.

Keshet E. Good Intensions: Paving Two Roads to a Theory of Good Intensions: Paving Two Roads to a Theory of the De re /De dicto Distinction. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2008.

Kripke S. Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press, 1980.

Maier E. Proper Names and Indexicals Trigger Rigid Presuppositions. Journal of Semantics #26: 253–315. 2009.

Matushansky O. Why Rose is the Rose: On the use of definite articles in proper names. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.) Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6. 285–307, 2006.

Matushansky O. On the Linguistic Complexity of Proper Names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31. No. 5: 573–627. 2008.

Matushansky O. On the Linguistic Complexity of Proper Names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31. No. 5: 573–627, 2008.

Padučeva E.V. i Uspenskij V.A. Podležaščee ili skazuemoe? Semantičeskij kriterij različenija podležaščego i skazemogo v binominal'nyx predloženijax. Izvestija Akademii SSSR, Serija Literatury i jazyka 38.4, Moskva, 1979. 349-360.

Partee B. Copula Inversion Puzzles in English and Russian. In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Herbert Coats, and Cynthia Vakareliyska, eds. Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Seattle Meeting 1998, Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 361-395. 1998.

Partee B. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In eds. J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh and M. Stokhof Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. 115-143. Dordrecht: Foris. 1986.

Pelczar M., Rainsbury J. The indexical character of names. Synthese, 114, 1998. Pp. 293–317.

Soames S. Beyond regidity. Oxford University Press, 2002.

Stalnaker R. Pragmatics. Synthese 22 (1-2):272--289. 1970

von Fintel K. and Heim I. Notes on Intensional Semantics. MIT Cambridge Mass, 2007. 

Full Text: