Publication Type:


Ivan A. Karpenko
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Issue number: 
No.2 (Vol.55)

The article analyzes the problem of physical theory nature and its criteria in the context of several concepts of modern physics. Such physical concepts allow multiple possible universes (the last usually happens to be a random consequence of the theory). Since the study requires several universe models, which basic principles (physical laws) can vary, the two theories have become the objects of analysis: the first, which includes the concept of eternal inflation, the second – the string cosmology (the string landscape). Both theories allow for a large variation of physical laws (no matter, whether these are fundamentally different physical laws or different versions of the same basic principles). The amount of dark energy (cosmological constant) has been selected as a physical law parameter, changing its value in possible universes. The analysis of the physical theories, which allow a multiplicity of universes, has shown that the standard requirements for the theory, which connect its veracity with the criteria of observability and the need for validation of our universe basic principles, are not entirely consistent. Theoretical physics is moving towards the formulization of models that become a real (in some cases, apparently irresistible) challenge for experimental verification. The article proves that such verification probably can not be required in several physical theories, since, in particular, the postulation of this kind of connection between theory and reality is no more than a manifestation of anthropocentrism. However, the theory can trace more general grounds that lie beyond the scope of human observation.

philosophy of science, physical theory, physical law, eternal inflation, dark energy, anthropic principle

't Hooft, G. “Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories”, Nuclear Physics B, 1974, vol. 79, iss. 2, pp. 276-84.

Augustine. Confessions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 352 pp.

Atkins, M. “Could the Higgs Boson be the Inflaton?”, Physical Letters B, 2011, vol. 697, pp. 37-40.

Albrecht, A., Steinhardt, P. “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking”, Physical Review Letters, 1982, vol. 48, no. 17, pp. 1220-1223.

Becker, K., Becker, M., Schwarz, J. String Theory and M-theory: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2006. 739 pp.

Čápek V., Sheehan D.P. Challenges to the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Theory and Experiment. Dordrecht: Springer. 2005. 356 p.

Сarroll S. From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. London: Oneworld Publications, 2011. 464 pp.

Cumrun V. “Evidence for F-theory”, Nucler Physics B, 1966, vol. 469, pp. 403-418.

Douglas, M. “The statistics of string / M theory vacua”, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2003, vol. 0305, p. 46.

Duff, M. “M-theory (the theory formerly known as strings)”, International Journal of Modern Physics A, 1996, vol. 11, no. 32, pp. 6523-41.

Gödel, K. “An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solution of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation”, Reviews of Modern Physics, 1949, vol. 21, pp. 447-450.

Guth, A. “Inflationary Universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems”, Physical Review D, 1981, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 347–356.

Guth, A. “Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe”, Physical Review Letters, 1982, vol. 49, no. 15, pp. 1110-1113.

Guth, A. The Inflationary Universe. London: Jonathan Cape. 1997. 384 pp.

Guth, A. “Eternal Inflation and Its Implications”, Journal of Physics A, 2007, vol. 40, pp. 6811-6826.

Kaluza, T. „Zum Unitätsproblem in der Physik“, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., 1921, pp. 966-972.

Klein, O.Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie“, Zeitschrift für Physik A, 1926, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 895-906.

Alexander, H.G. (ed.). Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1956. 256 pp.

Linde, A. “A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems”, Physics Letters B, 1982, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 389-393.

Linde, A. “Chaotic Inflation”, Physics Letters B, 1983, vol. 129, pp. 177-181.

Linde, A. “Eternally Existing Selfreproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe”, Physics Letters B, 1986, vol. 175, pp. 395-400.

Morgan, M., Morrison, M. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science (Ideas in Context). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 420 pp.

Perlmutter, S. “Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae”, The Astrophysical Journal, 1999, vol. 517, no. 2, pp. 565-586.

Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge. 2002. 544 pp.

Riess, A. “Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant”, The Astronomical Journal, 1998, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 1009-1038.

Smolin, L. Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013. 352 pp.

Starobinsky, A. “A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity”, Physics Letters B, 1980, vol. 91, pp. 99-102.

Susskind, L. The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design. New York: Little, Brown. 2005. 416 pp.

Vilenkin, A. “The birth of inflationary universes”, Physical Review D, 1983, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2848-2855.

Weinberg, S. “Anthropic bound on the cosmological constant”, Physical Review Letters, 1987, vol. 59, no. 22, pp. 2607-2610.

Witten, E. “String theory dynamics in various dimensions”, Nuclear Physics B, 1995, vol. 443, no. 1, pp. 85-126.

Full Text: