CONTEXTUALISM IN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Kontekstualizm v filosofii nauki
Author(s): 
Vladimir N. Porus
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Issue number: 
No.2 (Vol.55)
Pages: 
75-93
Abstract: 

The author discusses the possibility of spreading of the contextualism principles into the field of philosophy of science. He argues that, while discovering science in all of its aspects (viz. cultural, institutional, economic, communicative, etc.), philosophy of science identifies the relevant contexts for justifying the genesis, development, and reproduction of knowledge. Meanwhile, there is a complex interaction between philosophical and scientific analysis of these contexts. The author claims this process gives raise for a conflict which comes from the contextualization of science and the philosophical analysis of these contexts. The author shows that the resolution of these conflict could open new prospects for the modern philosophy of science.

Keywords: 
contextualism, philosophy of science, epistemology, verity, objectivity, pragmatism, rational reconstruction
References: 

Agassi, J. “The Philosophy of Science Today”, in: Shanker S. (ed.). Routledge History of Philosophy, v. IX. Philosophy of Science, Logic and Mathematics in the 20th Century. London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 235-265.

Berger P., Luckmann, T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nostiю Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. [The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge]. Moscow, Medium, 1995. 323 pp. (In Russian).

Callon, M., Latour, B. “Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them Do So”, in: Knorr-Cetina K, Cicourel A. (eds.). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro - and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981, pp. 277 – 303.

Dewey, J. The Quest for Certainty. A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. L.:George Allen & Unwin LTD., 1929. 300 pp.

Dewey, J., Bentley, A. Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press, 1949. 209 pp.

Fleck, L. Einführung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einfuhrung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co, 1935. 190 pp.

Fleck, L. Vozniknovenie i razvitie nauchnogo fakta: Vvedenie v teoriyu stilya myshleniya i myslitel'nogo kollektiva [The emergence and development of a scientific fact: Introduction to the theory of the style of thinking and the thinking collective]. Moscow: Idea-Press, 1999. 220 pp. (In Russian).

Harré, R. “Konstruktsionizm i osnovaniya znaniya” [Constructionism and the Foundations of Knowledge], in: Lektorski, V.A. (ed.). Konstruktivistskii podkhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke [Constructivist Approach in Epistemology and the Humanities]. Moscow: Kanon +, 2009, pp. 64 – 102. (In Russian).

Hill, T. I. Sovremennye teorii poznaniya [Modern Theories of Knowledge]. Moscow: Progress, 1965. 533 pp. (In Russian).

Kasavin, I.T. Text. Discourse. Context. Introduction to the social epistemology of language. Moscow: Canon +, 2008. 542 рp. (In Russian).

Kasavin, I.T., Porus, V.N. “Filosofiya nauki v Rossii: Ot intellektual'noi istorii k sovremennoi institutsializatsii” [Philosophy of Science in Russia: from Intellectual History to Modern Institutionalization], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2016, vol. 48, no. 2, рр. 6–17. (In Russian).

Kuhn, T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii [Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow: AST, 2001. 606 pp. (In Russian).

Lakatos, I. “Istoriya nauki i ee ratsional'nye rekonstruktsii” [History of science and its rational reconstruction], in: Lakatos, I. Izbrannye proizvedeniya po filosofii i metodologii nauki [Selected Works in Philosophy and Methodology of Science]. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008, pp. 203 – 235. (In Russian).

Latour, B. “Daite mne laboratoriyu, i ya perevernu mir” [Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world], Logos, 2002, no. 5-6, pp. 211-242. (In Russian).

Latour, B. Peresborka sotsial'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu [Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-network theory]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 2014. 384 pp. (In Russian).

Lektorski, V.A. Realizm, antirealizm, konstruktivizm i konstruktivnyi realizm v sovremennoi epistemologii i nauke [Realism, anti-realism, constructivism and constructive realism in modern epistemology], in: Lektorski, V.A. (ed.). Konstruktivistskii podkhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke [Constructivist approach in epistemology and the humanities]. Moscow: Kanon+, 2009. Pp. 5-40. (In Russian)

Maidanov, A.S. Methodology of scientific creativity [Methodology of science. Moscow: URSS, 2007. 512 p. (In Russian)

Mikeshina, L.A. Epistemologiya tsennostei [The Epistemology of Values]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2007. 439 pp.

Polanyi, M. Lichnostnoe znanie. Na puti k postkriticheskoi filosofii [Personal knowledge. Towards a postcritical philosophy]. Moscow: Progress, 1985.344 pp. (In Russian).

Porus, V.N. Paradoksal'naya ratsional'nost': ocherki nauchnoi ratsional'nosti [Paradoxical rationality: essays of scientific rationality]. Moscow: RAO, 1999. 122 pp. (In Russian).

Stepin, V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. Struktura, istoricheskaya evolyutsiya [Theoretical Knowledge. Structure, Historical Evolution]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2000. 744 pp. (In Russian).

Toulmin, S. “History, praxis and the «third world». Ambiguities in Lakatos' theory of methodology”, in: Cohen R.S., Feyerabend P.K., Wartofsky M.W. (eds.). Essays in memory of Imre Lakatos. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. XXXIX. Boston: Dordrecht 1976, pp. 655-676.

Toulmin, S. Chelovecheskoe ponimanie [Human Understanding: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts]. Moscow: Progress, 1984. 327 pp. (In Russian).

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201855230
Full Text: