Scientific activism and the idea of performativity

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Nauchnyy aktivizm i ideya performativnosti
Author(s): 
Olga E. Stoliarova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No.2 (Vol.55)
Pages: 
42-48
Abstract: 

The author analyzes the paradoxes of scientific activism from the standpoint of the concept of performativity. The author shows that the contradiction between the disinterested knowledge of the world and the interested action in society is generated by the traditional understanding of knowledge as a justified belief. The author discusses the so called performative conception of science, which gains many adherents in STS and replaces the standard concept of science. It is shown that when studying science as practice, the paradoxes of scientific activism are revised, because the rigid boundary between knowledge and action, science and values is removed.

Keywords: 
scientific activism, public policy, performativity, practice, knowledge, standard conception of science, public good
References: 

Aronowitz, S. Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988. 384 pp.

Ben-David, J. Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization and Ethos of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991. 591 pp.

Callon, M. “Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 1994 vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 395–424.

Clemens, E. S., Cook J. M. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change”, Annual Review of Sociology, 1999, vol. 25 pp. 441–466.

Fischer, F. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000. 352 pp.

Frickel, S., Moore, K. “Prospects and Challenges for a New Political Sociology of Science”, in: S. Frickel and K. Moore (eds.). The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2006, pp. 3–31.

Hoffman, L. M. The Politics of Knowledge: Activist Movements in Medicine and Planning. Albany: State University of New York Press. 312 pp.

Kasavin, I. T. “Philosophy of Science: Political Turn”, Herald of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 533–541.

Kleinman, D. L. (ed.). Science, Technology, and Democracy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000. 184 pp.

MacKenzie, D. An Engine, Not a Camera. How Financial Models Shape Markets. The MIT Press, 2006. 377 pp.

Pickering, A. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. 296 pp.

Radder, H. “Which Scientific Knowledge Is a Common Good?”, Social Epistemology, 2017, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 431–450.

Star, S. L., ed. Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996. 434 pp.

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201855226
Full Text: