The principle of participation and contemporary mechanisms of producing knowledge in science

Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Printsip uchastiya i sovremennye mekhanizmy proizvodstva znanii v nauke
Sofia V. Pirozhkova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No.1 (Vol.55)

The article deals with the problem of how production of scientific knowledge transforms nowadays. It is shown that current situation puts forward problem of integration different types of knowledge (not only scientific) – both for producing general meanings, and scientific knowledge. This problem is reflected in several conceptions in the philosophy of science: postacademic science, technoscience, transdisciplinarity. The author pays attention to an idea to be found in these conceptions and some current basic and applied studies; she calls it “the principle of participation”. A few embodiments of this principle are brought out, its conceptual core is revealed, epistemological questions this principle generates in respect to scientific knowledge are defined and some of them are considered in the article: what is a mechanism for aggregating dispersed knowledge? what is the difference between dispersed knowledge and dispersed information? who is the agent of such forms of production of knowledge as Delphi, scientific crowdsourcing, civic science and foresight? Several strategies of knowledge production in modern science (both academic and postacademic) are revealed, two versions of the principle of participation are proposed.

the principle of participation, production of knowledge, dispersed knowledge, information, Delphi, scientific crowdsourcing, civic science, foresight, deliberation.

Bodjakin, V.I. “Kategorija “znanie” s pozicii nejrosemantiki” [Category “knowledge” from the position of neurosemantics], Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami, 2007, vol. 16, pp. 51–65. (In Russian)

Føllesdal, A. “Survey Article: Subsidiarity”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 1998, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 190–218.

Galbraith, J. “Novoe industrial'noe obshhestvo” [The New Industrial State], trans. by L. Rozovskij et al. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo AST Publ., Tranzitkniga Publ.; St. Petersburg: Terra Fantastica Pub., 2004. 602 pp. (In Russian)

Granovskaja, O.L. “Epistemologicheskie teorii demokratii v kontekste idei tsennostnogo pljuralizma” [Epistemic theories of democracy in the context of value pluralism], Teoriya i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitiya, 2015, no. 11, pp. 198–200. (In Russian)

Haklay, M. Citizen Science and Policy: A European Perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2015. 67 p.

Halal, W.E., Brown, B.S. “Participative management: myth and reality”, California Management Review, 1981, vol. XXIII, no. 4, pp. 20–32.

Hayek, F.A. “The Use of Knowledge in Society”, The American Economist Review, 1945, no. 4, pp. 519–530.

Il’in, V.P.  “Fundamental'nye voprosy matematicheskogo modelirovaniya” [Fundamental issues of mathematical modeling], Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 118–126. (In Russian)

Kasavin, I.T. Sotsial'naya filosofiya nauki i kollektivnaya epistemologiya [Social philosophy of science and collective epistemology]. Moscow: Ves' mir Publ., 2016. 265 pp. (In Russian)

Kotljarov, I.D. “Ekonomicheskaya sushhnost' autsorsinga” [Economic nature of outsourcing], Ekonomika, 2010, no. 2, pp. 24–26. (In Russian)

Kyamusugulwa, P.M. “Participatory Development and Reconstruction: a literature review”, Third World Quarterly, 2013, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1265–1278.

Ledford, H. “Garage biotech: Life hackers”, Nature, 2010, no. 467(7316), pp. 650–652.

Mikeshina, L.A. Filosofija nauki: Sovremennaja jepistemologija. Nauchnoe znanie v dinamike kul'tury. Metodologija nauchnogo issledovanija: uchebnoe posobie [Philosophy of science: modern epistemology. Scientific knowledge in cultural dynamics. Metodology of scientific investigation: textbook]. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija Publ.: MPSI Publ.: Flinta Publ., 2005. 464 pp. (In Russian)

Ober, J. “Epistemic democracy in classical Athens: Sophistication, diversity, and innovation” [, accessed on 6.11.2017].

Pirozhkova, S.V. “Edinstvo i plyuralizm metodologii prognoznykh issledovanii” [Unity and Pluralism of Methodology of Forecasting], Filosofiya nauki i tehniki, 2017, no. 2, pp. 29–42. (In Russian)

Pirozhkova, S. “Technological forecasting as a prerequisite for successful country specialization”, Economic Annals-XXI, 2017, vol. 164, no. 3–4, pp. 53–55.

Popper, R. Mapping Foresight. Revealing how Europe and other world regions navigate into the future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2009. 128 pp.

Reason, P., Bradbury, H. (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Open University Press, 2008. 720 pp.

Sivkov, D.Ju. “Vizualizatsii «svoego» i «chuzhogo»: immunnye sistemy na skhematicheskikh izobrazheniyakh i mikrofotografiyakh” [Visualizations of “self” and “other”: immune systems in the schematic illustration and microphotographies], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2017, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 153–167. (In Russian)

Full Text: