Philosophical approaches to classifications of sciences: biology

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Filosofskie podkhody k klassifikatsiyam nauk: biologiya
Author(s): 
Olga E. Stoliarova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No.1 (Vol.55)
Pages: 
36-42
Abstract: 

This paper analyzes the phenomenon of classification of sciences as a subject of philosophical investigations. What is going on at the object- and the meta- levels of classifications of sciences? What is the structure of the meta-level of scientific classifications? The paper discusses the possibilities and limitations of philosophical approaches to the construction and analysis of scientific classifications. Social epistemology and historical epistemology have shown to be the most effective in analyzing both scientific classifications and classifications of sciences. The paper discusses substantive, methodological, cultural, and historical criteria of scientific classifications as they are applied to contemporary biology. Some of the contemporary problems of scientific classifications are considered through the reading of biological disciplinary classifications. It is shown that the classification disciplines in biology is organized according to the ontological, epistemological and social frameworks. 

Keywords: 
classification of sciences, scientific disciplines, biology, philosophy of science, social epistemology, historical epistemology, subjects and methods of sciences.
References: 

Antonovski, A. Yu. “Nauka kak obshchestvennaya podsistema: Niklas Luman o mekhanizmakh sotsial’noi evolyutsii znaniya i istiny” [Science as a social subsystem. Niklas Luhmann about mechanisms of social evolution of knowledge and truth], Voprosy filosofii, 2017, no. 7, pp. 158–171. (In Russian)
Badzhini, J. “Alan Sokal: moya filosofiya” [Alan Sokal: My Philosophy], in: Filosofiya nauki, 2010, no. 2 (45), pp. 130–136. (In Russian)
Kasavin, I. T. “Interaktivnye zony: k predystorii nauchnoi laboratorii” [Interactive zones: to the pre-history of scientific laboratory], Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 1098–1106. (In Russian)
Khachatryan, A. A. “O vitalizme i mehanitsizme kak paradigmah v biologii” [On Vitalism and Mechanism as the Paradigms of Biology], Uchenyie zapiski Kazanskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii veterinarnoy meditsinyi im. N.E. Baumana, 2010, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 322–326. (In Russian)
Lektorsky, V. A., et al. “Gumanitarnoe znanie i sotsial‘nye tekhnologii” [Humanities and social technologies], Voprosy filosofii, 2013, no. 9, pp. 3–30. (In Russian)
Momdzhyan, K. Kh., et.al. “Sistemno-teoreticheskii podkhod k ob”yasneniyu sotsial’noi real’nosti. Filosofskaya ili sotsiologicheskaya metodologiya” [Systematic theoretical approach to the explanation of the social reality. philosophical or sociological methodology], Voprosy filosofii, 2016, no. 1, pp. 17-–42. (In Russian)
Peirce, Ch. S. “Kratkaya klassifikatsiya nauk” [An Outlined Classification of the Sciences], in: Peirce, Ch. S. Izbrannyie filosofskie proizvedeniya [Collected Papers]. Moscow: Logos, 2000. 448 pp. (In Russian)
Speziali, P. “Classification of the Sciences”, in: P. P. Wiener (ed.). Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas in 4 vols. Vol. 1. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973, pp. 462–467.
Steen, W. J. van der. “The Classification of Disciplines in Biology: A Plea for Pluralism”, in: Acta Biotheoretica, 1980, no. 29, pp. 95–100.

DOI: 
10.5840/eps20185515
Full Text: