Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Ratsional'nost' v prave: podkhod N.Lumana
Liana A. Tukhvatulina
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No.4 (Vol.54)

Author considers the foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s communicative theory in application to the problem of rationality in law. She argues that one of the most important advantages of Luhmann’s approach is the rejection of the subject-centric interpretation of rationality. This sort of rejection makes it possible to consider rationality as an integral property of the legal system which reflects system’s sensitivity to some of incoming agitations. The author analyzes the concepts of “normative closure” and “cognitive openness” and their role in legal rationality justification. The author discusses the positive meaning of paradoxes in law and considers them as a consequence of the law’s open structure.  

Luhmann, rationality, theory of communication, paradox, tautology, philosophy of law, epistemology of law

Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press, 1996. xliii +631 p.

Hart G.L.A. Ponyatie prava [The Concept of Law]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Univ. Publ., 2007. 302 p.

Kasavin I.T., Sokuler Z.A. Ratsional'nost' v poznanii i praktike. Kriticheskii ocherk [Rationality in cognition and practice. Critical essay]. Moscow: Nauka, 1989. 192 p. (In Russian)

Luhmann N.  Closure and openness: on reality in the world of law. In: G. Teubner G. (ed.). Autopoietic law: a new approach to law and society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1988, pp. 335-348.

Luhmann N. The Self-Reproduction of Law and its Limits. In:  G.Teubner (ed.). Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 1986. 352p.

Luhmann N. Vlast’ [Macht]. Moscow: Praxis, 2001. 256p. (In Russian)

Luhmann N. Vvedenie v sistemnuyu teoriyu [Introduction to systems theory]. Moscow: Logos, 2007. 360 p. (In Russian)

Luhmann N., Ziegert K.A. (transl.). Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 512p.

Nazarchuk A.V. Teorii kommunikatsii v sovremennoi filosofii [Theories of communication in contemporary philosophy]. Moscow: Progress – Traditsiya, 2009. 320 p. (In Russian)

Perez O. The Institutionalisation of Inconsistency: From Fluid Concepts to Random Walk. In: O.Perez, G.Teubner (eds.). Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in the Law. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publ., 2006, pp. 119-144.

Rescher N. Paradoxes. Their Roots, Range and Resolution. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court. 2001. 320p.

Rio-de-Zhaneirskaya deklaratsiya po okruzhayushchei srede i razvitiyu [The Rio Delaration on Environment and Development (1992)]. [http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/declarations/riodecl.shtml, accessed on 08.06.2017] (In Russian)

Teubner G. Dealing with Paradoxes in Law: Derrida, Luhmann, Wiethoelter. In: O.Perez & G.Teubner (eds.). Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in the Law. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publ., 2006, pp. 41-64.

Toulmin S. Chelovecheskoe ponimanie [Human Understanding]. Moscow: Progress, 1984. 327 p. (In Russian)

Full Text: