Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Elena O. Trufanova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No.4 (Vol.54)

The article dwells upon social constructionist critique of the ideal of scientific objectivity. It is shown that a number of researchers tend to replace the universal principle of objectivity that is used in science with the concept of “situated knowledge”. This concept argues that each knowledge belongs to a certain local social group and can be considered only in a narrow sociocultural context. The supporters of the “situated knowledge” concept assume that this approach should be considered as “strong objectivity” that consists in the acknowledgment of the impossibility of the existence of neutral unbiased researcher in the scientific cognition and, consequently, the impossibility of acquiring true knowledge or even building a scientific theory. Instead they suggest to give a “vote” for each of these social groups to voice their own scientific statements that will be considered as equivalent, thus realizing the democratic principle. The article demonstrates the complications of this position and shows that it does not only lead to the loss of possibility to speak of science as universal cultural institute but also to the loss of mutual understanding and the possibility of dialogue between different social groups: each group instead of using the objectivity principle and striving to seek common knowledge, will insist on the paramount value of its own local “situated” knowledge.

objectivity, social constructionism, situated knowledge, feminist philosophy of science, knowledge, truth

Chertkova, E. L. ‘V poiskakh novoi epistemologii (O knige “Kul’turnoistoricheskaya epistemologiya: problemy i perspektivy. K 70-letiyu Borisa Isaevicha Pruzhinina”)’ [In the Search of New Epistemology (about the Book “Cultural-Historical Epistemology: Problems and Perspectives. To the 70th Anniversary of Boris I. Pruzhinin”)], Voprosy filosofii, 2016, no. 11, pp. 78–88. (In Russian)
Deblassio, A. ‘Novye tendentsii v al’ternativnykh epistemologiyakh’ [New tendencies in alternative epistemologies], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2010, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 160–172.
Gergen, K. ‘K kul’turno-konstruktsionistskoi psikhologii’ [Towards a cultural constructionist psychology], in: Gergen, K. Sotsial’nyi konstruktsionizm: znanie i praktika [Social Constructionism. Knowledge and Practice]. Minsk: BGU Publ., 2003, pp. 74–89. (In Russian)
Haraway, D. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies, 1998, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 575–599.
Harding, S. ‘Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity?’, in: Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005, pp. 218–236.
Harding, S. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991. 336 pp.
Kuhn, T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii [The structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2003. 605 pp. (In Russian)

Merton, R. K. Sotsial’naya teoriya i sotsial’naya struktura [Social theory and social structure]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2006. 873 pp. (In Russian) Pasha-Robinson, L. ‘SOAS students call for ‘white philosophers to be dropped from curriculum’, Independent. January 9. 2017. [http://www.independent. co.uk/news/uk/home-news/soas-university-of-london-students-union-whitephilosophers- curriculum-syllabus-a7515716.html, accessed on: 04.03.2017]
Pruzhinin, B. I. Ratio serviens? Kontury kul’turno-istoricheskoi epistemologii [Ratio serviens? The Outlines of Cultural-Historical Epistemology]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2009. 423 pp. (In Russian)
Reiss, J., Sprenger, J. ‘Scientific Objectivity’, in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming [https:// plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-objectivity/, accessed on: 04.03.2017]

Top 10 Collins Words of the Year 2016, in: Collins English Dictionary. 3 November 2016. [https://www.collinsdictionary.com/word-lovers-blog/new/ top-10-collins-words-of-the-year-2016,323,HCB.html, accessed on: 04.03.2017]
Trufanova, E. O. ‘O preimushchestvakh i nedostatkakh sotsial’nogo konstruktsionizma’ [On the advantages and disadvantages of social constructionism],
Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2015, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–36. (In Russian)

Turner, C. University students demand philosophers such as Plato and Kant are removed from syllabus because they are white, Telegraph. 8 January. 2017. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/01/08/university-students-dema... including-plato-kant/, accessed on: 04.03.2017]

Full Text: