Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Ivan S. Kurilovich
Russian State University for Humanities
Issue number: 
No.4 (Vol.54)

The author demonstrates the dialogic and historicity of the process of understanding, on the basis of which he comes to three conclusions that radically differ from the main points of the article under discussion: 1. the understanding is not a problem of personal and social meanings; 2. the understanding is structured like the recognition; 3. as well as recognition, the understanding is defined by positions, and therefore it is conflictual, it destroys subject-object relations. The consequence of it is the mutual transformation of the subject and the object of understanding, leaving no place for unimpaired subjectivity.

understanding, recognition, dialogue, cognition, transformation, subject, object

Gadamer, H.-G. Istina i metod [Truth and Method]. Moscow: Progress, 1988.
637 рp. (In Russian)
Habermas, J. Problematika ponimaniya smysla v sotsial’nykh naukakh [Problems of understanding meaning in social sciences], Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2008, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 3–33. (In Russian)
Collingwood, R. D. Ideya istorii. Avtobiografiya [The Idea of History. Autobiography]. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. 488 pp. (In Russian)
Nikiforov, A. L. O svyazi smysla i ponimaniya [On the connection between meaning and understanding], Epistemology & philosophy of science, 2013, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 44–54. (In Russian)
Nikiforov, A. L. Semanticheskaya kontseptsiya ponimaniya [Semantic concept of understanding], in: V. P. Filatov, A. A. Yakovlev (eds.). Zagadki chelovecheskogo ponimaniya [Mysteries of human understanding]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1991, pp. 72–94. (In Russian)
Ricoeur, P. Ponimanie i ob»yasnenie [Understanding and explanation], in: V. S. Stepin (ed.). Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya, vol. 3, [New philosophical encyclopedia], 2010, pp. 283–285. (In Russian)
Vygotsky, L. S. Myshlenie i rech’ [Thinking and Speech]. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 1934. 324 pp. (In Russian)

Full Text: