“High culture” as an indicator of constructivism’ options

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Problema «kul'tury s bol'shoi bukvy» kak indikator variantov konstruktivizma
Author(s): 
Vladimir Martynov
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Issue number: 
No.2 (Vol.52)
Pages: 
234-242
Abstract: 

The author claims that the recent publications on the theory of music and literature show some new trends in constructivist philosophy of culture. One of them is the idea of subconscious roots of cultural artifacts that has been applied in music studies. It was at this point it becomes clear that in order to identify variants of constructivism as indicators you can use some very simple assumptions, for example, the assumption of the possibility of the ontological significance of the “artistry” of the text. Such an assumption implicitly contains epistemological realism. So it becomes clear that realism is not something completely dead, including those for constructivism. Where constructivism allows the existence of good (“classic”) texts, that is, of “high culture”, he is tolerant to realism. On the other side, rejection of the classics is a sign of the radical versions of constructivism. There is possibility of fixing the difference between ontologies, which differ among themselves as a state of loss and forgetting the reality.

Keywords: 
constructivism, realism, philosophy of culture, “high culture”, S. Reynolds, G. Tihanov
References: 

Derrida, J. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. 128 pp.

Zhivov, V. “Gumanitarnye nauki: chem my stradaem i kak lechit’sya” [Humanities: how we suffer and how to be treated], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010, No. 106, pp. 43–48. (In Russian).

Kasavin, I. T. Sotsial'naya epistemologiya. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye problemy. [Social epistemology. Basic and applied problems]. Moscow: Alfa-M, 2013. 560 pр. (In Russian).

Martynov, V. “Zakat filologii” [Decline of philology], Vestnik Omskogo universiteta, 2014, No. 3, pp. 166–175. (In Russian).

Martynov, V. Opyt kul'turologii. [The experience of cultural studies], Voprosy kul'turologii, 2015, No. 3, pp. 33–45. (In Russian).

Nikiforov, A. L. “Yazyk i kartina mira” [Language and the picture of the world], Epistemology & philosophy of science, 2015, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 19–27. (In Russian).

Platt, K. F. M. “Autsaydery v obiteli kul'tury” [Outsiders in the monastery of culture], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012, No. 113, pp. 69–73. (In Russian)

Podoroga, V. “Kul'tura i real'nost'. Zametki na poljah” [Culture and reality. Marginalia], in: Massovaja kul'tura: sovremennye zapadnye issledovanija. [Popular culture: modern Western research]. Moscow: Fond nauchnykh issledovanii «Pragmatika kul'tury», 2005, pp. 308–337. (In Russian)

Reynolds, S. Retromaniya. Pop-kul'tura v plenu sobstvennogo proshlogo [Retromania. Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past]. Moscow: Beloje jabloko, 2015. 528 pp. (In Russian)

Tihanov, G. “Malye i bol'shie literatury» v menyayushchemsya formate istorii literatury” [Do ‘minor literatures’ still exist? The fortunes of a concept in the changing frameworks of literary history], Voprosy literatury, 2014, No. 6, pp. 253–278. (In Russian)

Tihanov, G. “Do ‘minor literatures’ still exist? The fortunes of a concept in the changing frameworks of literary history”, in: Re-Examining the National-Philological Legacy: Quest for a New Paradigm? Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2014, pp. 169–190.

Timofeeva, O. “Kak vozmozhna ‘provintsial'naya filosofiya’?” [How is the ‘the provincial philosophy’ possible?], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004, No. 70, pp. 374–378. (In Russian)

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201752241
Full Text: