Discourses and the types of future

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Diskursy i tipy budushchego
Author(s): 
Vadim Rozin
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No.2 (Vol.52)
Pages: 
137-152
Abstract: 

The article discusses the problems of the understanding of the future. The author suggests to consider this problem in accordance with the analysis of its discourse and types. He distinguishes the following kinds of temporal discourse: event time; contains the past; present; future; future reconstruction created on the basis of reconstructions of past and present; present actions in accordance with the images of future, finally, practices aimed at the implementation of the future as the plan or project. Based on the analysis of several cases and general considerations author introduces his classification of types of future discourse. Firstly, it is “uncertain future” (“future as a thing in itself”) as the most relevant type for modernity. Secondly, it is “objectively subjective future” that could be considered both as religious vision of the future and as the rational concept allowing a person to participate in constructing the future. Thirdly, it is “local technological future” that is considered on the example of the analysis of the US and USSR nuclear project. The current understanding of future is considered as an attempt to predict and to build the same future for everybody. The author argues that this attempt doesn’t seem to be feasible. Implementing different ideas and projects of the future and acting spontaneously without any particular image of the future, one cannot create the same future for everyone. Probably, it is necessary accept the fact that there’re a number of images of future and each of them is narrow. Somehow, they all are involved in the formation of future, but we do not know how. It is better to assume that any, even the inadequate and destructive, plans and future projects are involved in the formation and flow of social processes. That’s why it is so important to analyze them in order to understand their action and place in the structure of life.

Keywords: 
discourse, style, future, past, present, time, event, practice, plan, project implementation
References: 

Augustine. Ispoved' [Confessions]. Moscow: Respublika, 1992. 324 pp. (In Russian)

Bostrom, N. “Welcome to a World of Exponential Change”, in: P. Miller, J. Wilsdon (eds.) Better Humans? The politics of human enhancement and life extension. London: DEMOS, 2006, pp. 40–50.

Fukuyama, F. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, 1992. 418 pp.

Hargreaves, M. Evaluating system change: A planning guide. Methods Brief. Princeton, New Jersey: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. 2010. 453 pp.

Julien, F. O vremeni. Elementy filosofii zhit'” [About the “time”. Elements of “live” philosophy]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsia, 2005. 280 pp. (In Russian)

Kazyutinskiy, V. M. Traditsii i revolyutsiya v sovremennoy astronomii. (Doktorskaya dissertatsiya). [Tradition and Revolution in modern astronomy (Doctoral dissertation)]. Moscow: IF RAN, 1999. 250 pp. (In Russian)

Kurtz, C., Snowden, D. “The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world”, in: IBM Systems Journal, 2003, pp. 462–483.

Kurzweil, R. The Singularity is near. New York: Penguin Books, 2006. 672 pp.

Marx, K. Kapital. Vol. 2. [Das Kapital.Vol. 2]. The 8 ed. Moscow: Gospolitizdat 1935. 640 pp. (In Russian)

Marx, K. Kapital. Vol. 1. [Das Kapital.Vol. 1]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1978. 181 pp. (In Russian)

Smirnov S.A. (ed.) Novye identichnosti cheloveka. Analiz i prognoz antropologicheskikh trendov. Antropologicheskiy forsayt. Analiticheskiy doklad [The new identity of man. Analysis and forecast of anthropological trends. Anthropological foresight. Analytical report]. Novosibirsk: NGUJeU, 2013, pp. 216–241. (In Russian)

Plato. Gosudarstvo [Republic]. Coll. Op. 4 v. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl', 1994. 654 pp. (In Russian)

Roco, M., Bainbridge W. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance, Arlington: National Science Foundation/Department of Commerce. Arlington: Springer, 2002. 488 pp.

Rozin, V. M. “Pir Platona: Novaya rekonstruktsiya i nekotorye reministsentsii v filosofii i kul'ture [Plato’ “Feast”: A new reconstruction and some allusions in philosophy and culture]. Moscow: LENAND, 2015. 200 pp. (In Russian)

Rozin, V. M. Ezotericheskiy mir. Semantika sakral'nogo teksta [The esoteric world. The semantics of the sacred text]. Ed. 2. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2011. 320 pp. (In Russian)

Rozin, V. M. Tri mirooshchushcheniya i puti zhizni. Filosofskoe osmyslenie religii, ezoteriki i ratsionalizma [Three attitude and way of life. Philosophical understanding of religion, spirituality and rationality]. Yoshkar-Ola: PGTU, 2013. 324 pp. (In Russian)

Ruhnau, H. “The deconstruction of time and the emergence of temporality”, in: H. Atmanspacher, E. Ruhnau (eds.). Time, Temporality, Now. Experiencing Time and Concept of Time in an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997. pp. 35–45.

Theophane the Recluse. Chto est' dukhovnaya zhizn' i kak na nee nastroit'sya [The spiritual life and how to be attuned to it]. St. Petersburg: Sibirskaya blagozvonitsa, 1991. 288 pp. (In Russian)

Vrobel, S. Temporal Observer Perspectives, SCTPLS Newsletter, vol. 14, no. 1. Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology & Life Sciences, October 2006. 14p.

Zenkovskiy, V. V. Khristianskaya filosofiya [Christian philosophy]. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2010. 1072 pp. (In Russian)

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201752235
Full Text: