Logic, meaning and value from the performative perspective of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus Logico-Philosophics”

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Logika, smysl i tsennost' v performativnom izmerenii «Logiko-filosofskogo traktata» Lyudviga Vitgenshteina
Author(s): 
Sofia Danko
National Research University – Higher School of Economics
Issue number: 
No.2 (Vol.52)
Pages: 
71-86
Abstract: 

Many contemporary scholars converge the main issues of the “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus” with B. Russell’s agenda aimed at eliminating language confusion that causes “fundamental philosophical problems”. Although this may be correct to a certain degree, the main idea of the “Tractatus” often remains overlooked: according to Wittgenstein, establishing the language boundaries must lead us to the inexpressible meanings and values of life, and somehow demonstrate them. It was done by Wittgenstein in “Tractatus”, however results of his activity still remain in some way confidential, leaving a scope to various versions in this respect. This paper represents one of the possible approaches to this problem. It consists in the ultimate radicalization of characteristics of the logical structure showing that the facts within only the logical structure cannot be understood and described in comprehensible propositions. Thereby, it is possible to highlight the logical level of language and to show some non-logical meanings and values that contribute to the understanding of the world. This approach allows to show the performative perspective of “Tractatus” and to find the appropriate place for values and senses among the language expression. 

Keywords: 
analytical philosophy, L. Wittgenstein, B. Russell, logical structure, simple objects, atomized facts, “Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus”, value, meaning, ethics
References: 

Agamben, G. Griadushchee soobshhestvo [The Coming Community]. Moscow: Tri kvadrata, 2008. 144 pp. (In Russian)

Badiou, A. Wittgenstein’s Antiphilosophy. London: Verso, 2011. 186 pp.

Barrett, С. Wittgenstein on Ethics and Religious Beliefs. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1991. 256 pp.

Bonino, G. The Arrow and the Point. Russell and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Frankfurt a/M.: Ontos,Verlag, 2011, pp. 293–315.

Candlish, S. “Was Wittgenstein an Analytic Philosopher? Wittgenstein vs Russell”, Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2016, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 35–53.

Candlish, S., Damnjanovic, N. “The Tractatus and the Unity of the Proposition”, in: J. Zalabardo (ed.). Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 64–98.

Dammit, M. “Chto takoe teorija znachenija?” [What is the theory of meaning?], in: Filosofija, logika, jazyk, 1987, pp. 127–212. (In Russian)

Gorbatov, V. V. “Mezhdu Calculus Ratiocinator i Characteristica Universalis: spor dvukh paradigm v filosofskoi logike na rubezhe XIX-XX vekov” [Between Calculus Ratiocinator and Characteristica Universalis: the dispute of two paradigms in philosophical logic at the turn of XIX-XX centuries], Filosofskii zhurnal, 2009, No. 2, pp. 118–132. (In Russian)

Griffin, N. “Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement”, in: Philosophical Studies, 2008, Vol. 47, pp. 213–247.

Hacker, P. M. S. „Zwei Auffassungen von Sprache“, Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie, 2012, Vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 843–860. (In German)

Han, D. “Wittgenstein on Russell's theory of logical types”, Journal of Philosophical Research, 2013, Vol. 38, pp. 115–146.

Hintikka, J. “What Does the Wittgensteinian Inexpressible Express?”, The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 2003, Vol. XI, pp. 9–17.

Hintikka, Ja. O Vitgenshteine [On Wittgenstein]. Moscow.: Kanon+ROOI “Reabilitatsia”, 2012. 272 pp. (In Russian)

Hughes, L. “If there is any value that does have value, it must lie outside the whole sphere of what happens and is the case”, in: Search of Meaning: Ludwig Wittgenstein on Ethics, Mysticism and Religion. Karlsruhe: Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, 2009, pp. 51–66.

Hume, D. “Traktat o chelovecheskoi prirode” [A Treatise of Human Nature], in: Hume D. Sochineniya v dvuh tomakh [Works in two volumes]. Мoscow: Mysl', 1996, Vol. 1, pp. 53–657. (In Russian)

Hylton, P. Russell, Idealism, and The Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990. 440 pp.

Kant, I. “Kritika chistogo razuma” [The Critique of Pure Reason], in: Kant I. Sochineniya v vos'mi tomakh [Works in eight volumes]. Moscow: Mysl', 1994, Vol. 3. 591 pp. (In Russian)

Lindgren, A. Malysh i Karlson, kotoryi zhivet na kryshe [Karlsson-on-the-Roof]. Moscow: Astrel', 2008. 144 pp. (In Russian)

Makeeva, L. Yazyk, ontologiya i realizm [Language, Ontology and Realism]. M.: NRU HSE, 2011. 312 pp. (In Russian)

Mezzadri, D. “Nominalism and Realism. How Not to Read the Tractatus. Conception of a Name”, Philosophical Investigations, 2014, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 208–227.

Mezzadri, D. “Types, forms, and unity: Wittgenstein's criticism of Russell's theory of judgment”, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 2014, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 177–193.

Pandey, K. C. Religious Beliefs, Superstitions and Wittgenstein. New Delhi: Readworthy, 2009. 294 pp.

Proops, I. “Logical Atomism in Russell and Wittgenstein”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 214–239.

Russell, B. The Problems of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. 168 pp.

Shamis, D. “Moral'noe chuvstvo kak fenomen gnoseologii” [Moral feeling as a phenomenon of epistemology], Filosofskie nauki, 2015, No. 10, pp. 111–126. (In Russian)

Sokuler, Z. A. Ljudvig Vitgenshtejn i ego mesto v filosofii XX v. [Ludwig Wittgenstein and his place in philosophy of XX century]. Dolgoprudnyj: Allegro-Press, 1994. 171 pp. (In Russian)

Tatievskaya, E. „Wittgenstein über komplexes“, Logique et Analyse, 2008, Vol. 51, No. 204, pp. 395–409.

Von Eeden, F. “Word-Value” and “The ‘I’”, in: Sign In Law – A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III, 2015, pp. 31–39.

Wittgenstein, L. Dnevniki 1914-1916 [Diaries 1914-1916]. Moscow: Kanon+ROOI “Reabilitacija”, 2009. 400 pp. (In Russian)

Wittgenstein, L. “Lekcija ob jetike” [“The Lecture about ethics”], in: Istoriko-filosofskij ezhegodnik, 1989, pp. 238–251. (In Russian)

Wittgenstein, L. Logiko-filosofskij traktat [Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]. Moscow: Nauka, 1958. 132 pp. (In Russian)

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201752231
Full Text: