Historical epistemology: epistemology and the other philosophy

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Istoricheskaya epistemologiya: epistemologiya i drugaya filosofiya
Author(s): 
Alexander Pisarev
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No.2 (Vol.52)
Pages: 
34-39
Abstract: 

The author considers the thesis about the opposition between the universal (philosophy of science) and particular (history of science), and about the retreat of epistemology in their juxtaposition to the transformations in contemporary philosophy during last decades and its links to science studies. He claims that in order to define historical epistemology project a reason to support this project is to be found.

Keywords: 
epistemology, history and philosophy of science, contingency, heterogeneity, multiplicity
References: 

Badiou, A. Manifest Filosofii [Manifesto for philosophy]. St. Petersburg: Machina, 2003. 184 pp. (In Russian)
Bloor, D. “Anti-Latur” [Anti-Latour], Logos, 2017, No. 1, pp. 85–134. (In Russian)
Daston, L. J., Galison Р. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007. 504 pp.
Gavrilenko, S. M. “Istoricheskaja epistemologija: zona neopredelennosti I prostranstvo teoreticheskogo voobrazhenija” [Historical Epistemology: zone of uncertainty and space of theoretical imagination], Epistemology & philosophy of science, 2017, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 20–28. (In Russian)
Hacking, I. The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mssachusetts and London: Harvard University Press, 1999. 272 pp.
Hajdegger, M. Kant i problema metafiziki [Kant and the problem of metaphysics]. Moscow: Logos, 1997. 176 pp. (In Russian)
Kralechkin, D. Fundamental’noe razlichie bytiya i sushchego kak sposob obosnovaniya ontologii. Dissertatsia na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata
filosofskih nauk [Fundamental difference of being and entities as a way of justification ontology. PhD Thesis]. Moscow, 2002. 146 pp. (In Russian)
Latour, B. “Biografia odnogo issledovaniya: k rabote o modusakh sushchestvovaniya” [Biography of an Investigation: On a Book about Modes of
Existence], Logos, 2017, No. 1 pp. 217–244. (In Russian)

Latour, B. “Devidu Bluru… i ne tol’ko: otvet na “Anti-Latur” Devida Blura” [For David Bloor and Beyond: A Reply to David Bloor’s “Anti-Latour”], Logos, 2017, No. 1. pp. 135–162. (In Russian)
Meyasu, K. Posle Konechnosti. Esse o Neobkhodimoi Kontingentnosti [After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency]. Ekaterinburg, Moscow: Kabinetnyi Uchenyi, 2015. 196 pp. (In Russian)
Pickering, A. Constructing quarks: a sociological history of particle physics. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984. 475 pp.
Schmidgen, H. Bruno Latour in Pieces: An Intellectual Biography. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014. 175 pp.

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201752226
Full Text: