Historical epistemology: zone of uncertainty and space for theoretical imagination

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Istoricheskaya epistemologiya: zona neopredelennosti i prostranstvo teoreticheskogo voobrazheniya
Author(s): 
Stanislav Gavrilenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Issue number: 
No.2 (Vol.52)
Pages: 
20-28
Abstract: 

This article attempts to define a historical epistemology not as separate place in disciplinary space, but as rather specific area, which unstable configuration and “stuff” are determined by quite different from philosophy ways of talking and investigation of knowledge, especially in social sciences. More significant than emergence of competitors of philosophy in production of knowledge about knowledge (sociology, history, anthropology) was that they introduce a new regime of this production. This regime became empirical. Within that regime knowledge is objectified not as homogeneous order of representation, but as fuzzy dynamic set of heterogeneous elements, relations between which are complex and historically variable. The claims of non-philosophical disciplines to investigate knowledge generate the field of uncertainties and problematisations. Just this field is referred to as “historical epistemology”. But this field is also space of conceptual imagination, where the new ways to investigate knowledge are worked on, when refusing to ascribe to it any ultimate (transcendent or transcendental) specification.
 

Keywords: 
Historical Epistemology, uncertainty, history and philosophy of science, sociology, multiplicity, heterogeneity
References: 

Bikbov, A. Grammatika poryadka: Istoricheskaya sotsiologiya ponyatii, menyayushchikh nashu real’nost’ [The Grammar of Order: A Historical Sociology of the Concepts That Change Our Reality]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vyshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014. 432 pp. (In Russian)
Bourdieu, P. “Dukh gosudarstva: k genezisu byurokraticheskogo polya” [Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field], in:
Bourdieu P. Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva [Sociology of social field]. St. Petersburg: Aleteia, Moscow: Institut eksperimentalnoi sotsiologii, 2005, pp. 220–254. (In Russian)
Crampton, J. W. Mapping: A Critical Introduction to Cartography and GIS. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 232 pp.
Daston, L., Galison P. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007. 512 pp.
Daston, L., Lunbeck, E. (eds.). Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 2011. 480 pp.
Dmitriev, I. S. Upryamyi Galilei [Stubborn Galileo]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2015. 848 pp. (In Russian)
Durkheim, E. O metode sotsiologii [Rules of sociologcal method], in: Durkheim E. Sotsiologiya. Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie [Sociology]. Moscow: Kanon, 1995, pp. 5–164. (In Russian)

Foucault, M. Bezopasnost’, territoriya, naselenie. Kurs lektsii, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1977-1978 uchebnom godu [Safety, Territory, Population.
Lectures at the Collège de France in 1977-1978]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2011. 544 pp. (In Russian)
Foucault, M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’: rozhdenie tyur’my [Discipline and Punish]. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 1999. 480 pp. (In Russian)
Galison, P. “Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science”, Isis, 2008, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 111–125.
Latour, B. Voina mikrobov [War and Peace of Microbes]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2015. 320 pp. (In Russian)
Le Goff, J. Intellektualy v srednie veka [Intellectuals in the Middle Ages]. St. Petersburg: Izdat.dom SPbGU, 2003. 160 pp. (In Russian)
Scott, D. Blagimi namereniyami gosudarstva [Seeing like a state]. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga, 2010. 568 pp. (In Russian)
Shapin, S., Schaffer, S. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbs, Boyle and Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. 448 pp.
Shipovalova, L. V. “Stoit li nauku myslit’ istoricheski?” [Should we conceive historically?], Epistemology & philosophy of science, 2017, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 18– 28. (In Russian).
Turnbull, D. Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers: Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2003. 276 pp.
Wood, D. Rethinking the Power of Map. London, New York: The Guilford Press, 2010. 335 pp.

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201752224