“The crisis of representation” in the social sciences in the middle of 1980-90s: critics of the process of cognition and sociological narratives

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
«Krizis reprezentatsii» v sotsial'nykh naukakh na rubezhe 1980-90kh gg.: kritika protsessa poznaniya i sotsiologicheskikh narrativov
Author(s): 
Nikolai Rudenko
Sociological Institute, Russian Academy of Science; European University at Saint Petersburg
Issue number: 
No.1 (Vol.51)
Pages: 
206-220
Abstract: 

“The Crisis of representation” – a discussion that was hold from the middle of 1980 to the middle of 1990s in social sciences, when the legitimation of the big social theories was questioned as well as the deconstruction of scientific texts and the process of knowing, based on positivistic principles, were done. In this article the author offers the analysis of intellectual context of the development of social sciences (sociology and anthropology) in the crisis. The latter are analyzed in three aspects. Firstly, the crisis concerned the process of knowing, based on principle of the unity of methods and concepts: some authors argued the influential role of language in the construction of reality. Other authors referred to implicit moral and political dimensions while the third provided deconstruction of the scholar figure and the notion of reality. In a similar vein, the crisis was articulated in the critics of scientific texts where implicit meanings and rhetorical devices were found. To the author’s view, the need of reconstruction of the crisis of representation can be explained by the want of more reflexive approach to the practices of social sciences today.

Keywords: 
the crises of representation, social sciences, scientific process of knowing, scientific text, poststructuralist, postmodernism, critical theory
References: 

Adorno T., Adey G., Frisby D. The positivist dispute in German sociology. London: Heinemann London, 1983. 351p.

Agger B. Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance. In: Annual review of sociology, 1991. vol.17, pp. 105-131.

Becker H. S., McCall M. M. (eds.). Symbolic interaction and cultural studies. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1990. 296p.

Brown R. H. A poetic for sociology: Toward a logic of discovery for the human sciences. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1977. 318p.

Brown R. H. Rhetoric, textuality, and the postmodern turn in sociological theory. In: Seidman S. (ed.) The Postmodern Turn. New perspectives on Social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 229 – 242.

Clifford J. Introduction: Partial Truths. In: Clifford J., Marcus G. (eds). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986, pp. 1 – 27.

Denzin N. The Poststructural Crisis in the Social Sciences: Learning from James Joyce. In: Brown R. H. (ed.) Postmodern Representations. Truth, Power, And Mimesis in the Human Sciences and Public Culture. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1995, pp. 38 – 60.

Edmondson R. Rhetoric in Sociology. London and Basingstoke: The Macmillan press LTD, 1984. 190p.

Fujimura J. On methods, ontologies, and representation in the sociology of science: Where do we stand. In: Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss. Transaction Publishers, 1991, pp. 207-248.

Geertz C. Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988. 168p.

Gottdiener M. Ideology, foundationalism, and sociological theory. In: The Sociological Quarterly, 1993, vol.34, no.4, pp. 653-671.

Halfpenny P. Positivism and Sociology: Explaining Social Life. London and New York: Routledge, 2014. 122p.

Hammersley M. What's Wrong with Ethnography?: Methodological Explorations? London and New York, Routledge, 1992. 230p.

Journal of Contemporary Ethnography [http://jce.sagepub.com/content/by/year/1973, accessed on 30. 11. 2016].

Kuhn T. Struktura nauchnyh revoljucij [Structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow:AST, 2003. 605 p. (In Russian)

Lamont M. How to become a dominant French philosopher: The case of Jacques Derrida. In: American Journal of Sociology, 1987, vol.93, no.3, pp. 584-622.

Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Los Angeles: The Sage, 1979. 272p.

Mills Ch. Sociological Imagination. New York : Oxford University Press, 1959. 234p.

O'Neill J. Sociology as a Skin Trade. In: Sociological Inquiry, 1970, vol.40. no.1, pp. 101-104.

Potapova N. D. Lingvisticheskij povorot v istoriografii [The linguistic turn in historiography]. Saint Petersburg: EUSPb, 2015. 384 p. (In Russian)

Qualitative Inquiry [http://qix.sagepub.com, accessed on 30. 11. 2016].

Rabinow P. Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In: Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: Univ. of California Press, 1986, pp. 234-261.

Review Symposium “Crisis of representation’’ In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 2002, vol.31, no.4, pp. 478 – 516.

Seidman S. Introduction. In: Seidman S. (ed.) The Postmodern Turn. New perspectives on Social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 1 – 27.

Seidman S. Postmodern Social Theory as Narrative with Moral Intent. In: Siedman S., Wagner D. (eds.) Post-modernism and Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, pp. 47-81.

Sparkes A. C. Writing people: Reflections on the dual crises of representation and legitimation in qualitative inquiry. In: Quest, 1995, vol. 47, no.2, pp. 158-195.

Szelenyi I. The Triple crisis of sociology [https://contexts.org/blog/the-triple-crisis-of-sociology, accessed on 30. 11. 2016].

Thrift N. Non-Representational Theories: A Primer. London and New York: Routledge, 2007. 336p.

Van Maanen J. Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Second Edition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2011. 232p.

Vidich A. J., Lyman S. M. Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology. In: Denzin N. (ed.) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: The Sage, 1994,  pp. 37-84.

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201751119
Full Text: