Enactivism and the problem of consciousness

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Enaktivizm i problema soznaniya
Author(s): 
Dmitry Ivanov
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No. 3 (Vol. 49)
Pages: 
88-104
Abstract: 

The paper deals with the enactivist approach to the problem of consciousness. The problem of consciousness is the problem of naturalistic explanation of phenomenal aspects of our experience. According to classical cognitive science, we can explain all mental states as functional, representational states. Many philosophers disagree with this view. They demonstrate that phenomenal qualities of conscious states cannot be understood in terms of mental representations. Contemporary debates about the nature of phenomenal qualities are the debates between representationalists and anti-representationalists. The arguments proposed by anti-representationalists demonstrate the insufficiency of classical representational approach. But it doesn’t mean that we should accept the existence of qualia – special non-representational phenomenal properties. It is possible to defend representationalism by reconsidering the nature of mental representations. This article examines the transformation of the concept of mental representation in cognitive science over the last few decades. It demonstrates that the notion of representation in action discussed in enactivist theories can help us to provide the foundation for naturalistic understanding of conscious experience.

Keywords: 
philosophy of mind, philosophy of cognitive science, enactivism, the problem of consciousness, phenomenal consciousness, qualia, mental representation
References: 

Chalmers D. Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. 414p.

Churchland P.S., Sejnowsky T. Neural Representation and Neural Computation. In: Mind and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990. P. 133-152.

Clark A. Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. 210p.

Dennett D. C. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1991. 511p.

Fodor J. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987. 171p.

Fodor J., Pylishin Z. Konnekstionism i kognitivnaya struktura: kriticheskiy obzor. [Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis]. In: Yazyk i intellect. [Language and intelligence]. Мoscow: Progress Publ., 1996, pp. 230-313. (In Russian)

Jackson F. Epiphenomenal Qualia. In: Philosophical Quarterly, 1982, vol.32, no.127, pp. 127-136.

Levine J. Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 1986, vol. 6, pp. 354-361.

Nagel T. What is it like to be a bat? In: Philosophical Review, 1974, vol. 83, pp. 435-50.

Newell A., Simon H. Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search. In: Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1981, vol. 19, pp. 113-126.

Noë A. Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004. 296p.

Shapiro L. Embodied Cognition. New York: Routledge, 2011. 237p.

van Gelder T. What might cognition be if not computation?  In: Journal of Philosophy, 1995, vol. 92, no.7, pp. 345-381.

Varela F., Thompson J.E., Rosch E. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991. 328p.

 

Full Text: