Towards the unity of science again? Reductionist thinking and it´s consequence for a social philosophy of science

Publication Type:


Alexander Ruser
Zeppelin University
Issue number: 
No. 3 (Vol. 49)

At first glance the Idea of the “Unity of Science” seems to be of interest for historians of science only. However, given the expectations especially social scientists face today, to provide simple answers and feasible solutions to pressing social problems a revival of the idea is not unlikely. In particular “reductionist” ideas, aiming to adopt theoretical and methodological insight from the natural sciences thrive. This puts not only the project but also the very idea of a social philosophy of science in jeopardy. For, in consequence two of its main pillars, (1) considering the social and historic circumstance of knowledge production and (2) the need for developing a philosophy of the social sciences are equally rendered irrelevant. This contribution focuses on the fundamental flaws and shortcomings of such reductionist models, argues in favor of the disunity of science and thus defends the idea of a social philosophy of science.

unity of science, philosophy of science, micro-reduction, Huxley´s Problem

Agassi J. Science in Flux. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XXVIII. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel Publ., 1975. 560 p.

Borchert K., Hanke E., Schluchter. W. Max Weber Gesamtausgabe. Band I/23 Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Soziologie. Unvollendet. 1919–1920. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013. 847 p.

Comte A. Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. Part 1. New York: Calvin Blanchard, 1855. 340 p.

Comte A. Social Physics: From the Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. New York: Calvin Blanchard, 1855. 73 p.

Cohen B. Review: International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I and II. Isis, 1942, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 721–723.

Feyerabend P. Science in a Free Society. London, New York: Verso, 1978. 221 p.

Galbraith J. The End of Normal. New York, London: Simon & Schuster, 2014. 304 p.

Laplace P. A philosophical essay on probabilities. New York, London: J. Wiley, 1902. 225 p.

McRae R. The Unity of Science: Bacon, Descartes and Leibniz. Journal Of the History of Ideas, 1957, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 27–48

Mills C.W. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959. 248 p.

Mirowski P. Machine Dreams. Economics becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 655 p.

Morris C. On the History of the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Synthese, 1960, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 517–521.

Oppenheim P., Putnam H. Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. In: Feigl H. et al (eds.). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2. Minneapolis: Minnesota university press, 1958, pp. 3–36.

Plomin R., Caspi A. Behavioral Genetics and Personality. In: L.A. Pervin, O.P. John (eds.) Handbook of Personality. New York: The Guilford Press, 1990, pp. 251–276.

Popper K. Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind. Dialectica, 1978, vol. 3, no. 3–4, pp. 339–355.

Poovey M. A History of Modern Fact. Problems of Knowledge in the Science of Wealth and Society. University of Chicago Press, 1998. 436 p.

Seeley T. D. Honeybee Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. 271 p.

Weber M. Economy and Society, vol. 1, ed. by G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1978. 1712 p.

Whitehead A.N. Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan, 1925. 345 p.

Wilson E.O. Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. Boston: Abacus, 1998. 364 p.

Full Text: