THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS AND A PRIORI KNOWLEDGE

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Myslennye eksperimenty i apriornoe poznanie
Author(s): 
Vladimir Filatov
Russian State University for Humanities
Issue number: 
No. 3 (Vol. 49)
Pages: 
17-27
Abstract: 

Thought experiments are traditionally associated with physics. In this science we can find a lot of wonderful examples of this method, especially in periods of scientific revolutions. But in the last decade in physics thought experiments are becoming increasingly rare, but in the social sciences and philosophy, they are widely used. What gives thought experiments, what is their value for scientific knowledge? Is it possible to use them to obtain new knowledge or they are just visual or paradoxical illustrations of any problems? The key issue, which I propose to discuss is the possibility to get with the help of thought experiments a priori knowledge. I will try to prove that it was impossible, that thought experiments have other functions in cognition.

Keywords: 
thought experiment, a priori, epistemology, scientific knowledge
References: 

Brown J.R. The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. London: Routledge, 1991. 177 p.

Aristotle. Physics. In: Aristotle. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works, in 4 vols.], vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1981. 613 p.

Carnap R. Filosofskie osnovaniya fiziki [Philosophical foundations of physics]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1971. 390 p. (In Russian) 

Feyerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po filosofii nauki [Selected works on philosophy of science]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1986. 543 p. (In Russian)

Galileo. Besedy i matematicheskie dokazatel’stva, kasayushchiesya dvukh novykh oblastey nauki [Discorsi e dimonstrationi mathematiche, intorno a due nuone
scienze, attenentialla Mecanica I Movimenti Locali]. In: Galileo. Izbrannye trudy [Selected works], vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1964. 634 p. (In Russian)

Harre R. Konstruktsionizm i osnovaniya znaniya [Constructivism and the basis of knowledge]. In: V.A. Lektorsky (ed.) Konstruktivistskiy podkhod v epistemologii
i naukakh o cheloveke [Constructivist approach in epistemology and humanities]. Moscow: Kanon ROOI “Reabilitatsiya” Publ., 2009. 368 p.

Ivanov D. Priroda fenomenal’nogo soznaniya [The nature of phenomenal consciousness]. Moscow: LIBROCOM Publ., 2013. 236 p.

Koyre A. Galileo’s Treatise “De Motu Gravium”: The Use and Abuse of Imaginary Experiment. In: Koyre A. Metaphysics and Measurement. London:
Chapman & Hall, 1968, pp. 89–117.

Kruglov A. Transtsendentalizm v filosofii [Transcendentalism in philosophy]. Moscow: Voskhod-A Publ., 2000. 384 p. (In Russian)

Mach E. Poznanie i zabluzhdenie. Ocherki po psikhologii issledovaniya [Erkenntnis und Irrtum: Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung]. Moscow: BINOM Publ., 2003. 236 p. (In Russian)

Popper K. Logika nauchnogo issledovaniya [Logic of scientific discovery]. Moscow: AST: Astrel’ Publ., 2010. 275 p. (In Russian)

Putnam H. Razum, istina i istoriya [Reason, Truth, and History]. Moscow: Praxis Publ., 2002. 296 p. (In Russian)

Full Text: