Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Gippokrat i Aristotel' (k voprosu o stanovlenii pervykh logicheskikh programm)
Irina Gerasimova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No. 2 (Vol. 48)

The author argues that an analysis of the texts of the Collection of Hippocrates leads to the conclusion that long before the methodological genius of Aristotle there existed a highly analytical culture among medical professionals. The differences in understanding of the value and objectives of a valid inference in Hippocrates and Aristotle are explained in terms of the characteristics of the discourse that each of them used. Aristotle is argued to have been using a social-dialectical discourse, whereas, in medical practice, a combination of skills and reasoning had the highest value because what was expected from a doctor was the right diagnosis and the right treatment.

The author argues that rational medical tradition of antiquity did not reach the logical reflection. According to her, the doctrine of the necessary connection between the logical attribute and the object of inferences had been developed in the Buddhist logic, which, as the author argues, can be considered a rational component of education in Tibetan medicine.

antique medicine, Hippocrates, Aristotle, plausible reasoning, semiotics, natural classification, reasoning from sign, Buddhist logic

Аmasiatsi A. Unnecessary for ignoramuses: scientific inheritance [Nenuzhnoe dlya neuchej: Nauchnoe nasledstvo], vol. 13 : transl. by S.А. Vardanyan. Moscow: Nauka, 1990. 880 p.
Аristotle. Collected works in 4 volumes. Vol.1. ed. by V.F. Аsmus. Moscow: Mysl', 1975. 550 p.
Аristotle.  Collected works in 4 volumes. Vol.2. ed. by Z.N. Mikeladze. Moscow: Mysl', 1978. 687 p. 
Аristotle. Collected works in 4 volumes. Vol.3. Intr. by I.D. Rozhansky. Moscow: Mysl', 1981. 613 p.
Аfonasin E.V.  Galen “On rumors for beginners” [Galen «O tolkakh dlya nachinayushhikh»]. ΣΧΟΛΗ. 2015. Vol. 9.1, pp. 56-58.
Аfonasin E.V., Аfonasina А.S. Herophilus on pulse [Gerofil o pul'se]. ΣΧΟΛΗ. 2015. Vol. 9, pp. 93-104.
Vedenova E.G. Border, the continuum, the number[Granitsa, kontinuum i chislo]. In: The number – Chislo. Ed.by Krichevets А.А. Moscow: MАKS Press. 2009. pp.79–81.
Verlinskij А.L. Medical Analogies and the problem of practical appliying of Plato and Aristotel knowledge [Meditsinskie analogii i problema prakticheskogo primeneniya znaniya u Platona i Аristotelya]. In:  Some problems of the history of ancient science - Nekotorye problemy istorii antichnoj nauki. Leningrad: IIET, Glavnaya astronomicheskaya observatoriya. 1987. pp. 90–111.

Galen. On rumors for beginners [O tolkakh dlya nachinayushhikh]. ΣΧΟΛΗ. 2015. Vol. 9.1. pp. 59-72.
Gerasimova I.А. The unity of plurality (epistemological analysis of cultural practices) [Edinstvo mnozhestvennogo (ehpistemologicheskij ana-liz kul'turnykh praktik]. Moscow: Аl'fa-M. 2010. 304 p.
Gerasimova I.А. Biomedical technologies as a problem of history and philosophy of science [Biomeditsinskie tekhnologii kak problema istorii i filosofii nauki].Epistemology and philosophy of science, 2014, no.2, pp. 5–18.
Gerasimova I.А. Galenovo on Hippocrates in the context of astromedicine [«Galenovo na Gippokrata» v kontekste astromeditsiny]. Problems of philosophy -  Voprosy filosofii, 2015, no.1, pp. 51–60.
Gerasimova I.А., Mil'kov V.V., Simonov R.А. Sacred knowledge of  Old Russia [Sokrovennye znaniya Drevnej Rusi].In:  The thought in Old Russia - Pamyatniki drevnerusskoj mysli: issledovaniya i pub-likatsii, vol. VIII. Moscow: KNORUS, 2015. 680 p.
Hippocrates. Selected books. Transl. by V.I. Rudnev. Mpscpw: Gos. izd. biologicheskoj i meditsinskoj literatu-ry, 1936.736 p.
Hippocrates. Aphorisms [Аforizmy]. Transl. by V.I. Rudnev Karpova. Moscow: EHKSMO. 2009. 400 p.
Demin R.N.  Astronomical ideas in the corpus of Hippocrates [Аstronomicheskie predstavleniya v Gippokratovom korpuse]. Some problems of the ancient science - Nekotorye problemy istorii antichnoj nauki. Leningrad, 198, pp.47–56.
Dubrovin D.А. Hard problems of the classical Chinese medicine [Trudnye voprosy klassicheskoj kitajskoj meditsiny]. Leningrad: Аsta-press. 1991. 227 p.

 Egorov А.S. Empedocles and the problem of the Greek shamanism [Empedokl i problema grecheskogo shamanizma]. Problems of philosophy - Voprosy filosofii, 2007, no.8, pp.97–105.

Zhambaldagmaev N.T. Buddhist logic and the diagnostics in the Tibetan medicine [Buddijskaya logika i diagnostika v tibetskoj meditsine]. Papers of the scientific seminar of the Centre of Logic of the Institute of philosophy, RAS - Trudy nauchno-issledovatel'skogo seminara Logicheskogo tsentra Insti-tuta filosofii RАN. 1997. Moscow: IFRАN, 1998, pp. 163-169.
Pierce Ch. Selected philosophical papers [Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya]. Moscow: Logos, 2000. 448 p.
V.А. Smirnov, А.M. Аnisov, G.P. Аrutyunov, D.V. Dmitriev, А.S. Melent'ev, F.T. Mikhajlov. Logic and the clinical diagnostics. The theoretical basics [Logika i klinicheskaya diagnostika. Teoreticheskie osno-vy]. Moscow: Nauka. 1994. 297 p.
Karpov V.V. Hippocrates and the Hipocrates collection [Gippokrat i Gippokratov sbornik]. In:  Hippocrates. Selected books - Gippokrat. Izbrannye knigi. Moscow: Gos. izd. biologicheskoj i meditsinskoj literatury. 1936. pp. 9–81.
Lysenko V.G. Аyurveda. In Indian philosophy. Encyclopedia -  Indijskaya filosofiya. Entsiklopediya. Moscow: Vost. Lit.; Аkademicheskij proekt; Gaudeamus. 2009. 950 p.
Lysenko V.G., Kanaeva N.А. Shantarakshita and Kamalashila on instruments of the reliable knowledge  [Shantarakshita i Kamalashila ob instrumentakh dostovernogo poznaniya]. Moscow: IFRАN. 2014. 295 p.
Medved А.N. Healing art inOld Russia: the modern state, researches and bibliography [Drevnerusskoe vrachevanie: sovremennoe sostoyanie, issle-dovaniya i bibliografiya]. Moscow: OOO «Izdatel'stvo MBА». 2013. 84 p.
Medved А.N.  An antropology of the disease in Old Russia (X-XVII c.) [Аntropologiya bolezni v Drevnej Rusi (X-XVII vv.). Ocher-ki istorii]. Moscow: OOO «Izdatel'stvo MBА». 2013. 232 p.
Mirsky M.B. The history of medicine and surgery for students [Istoriya meditsiny i khirurgii : uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vyssh. prof. obr.] Moscow: GEHOTАR-Media. 2010. 528 p.
Simakov Yu.G. Animals analyzing the world [Zhivotnye analiziruyut mir]. Moscow: RIPOL KLАSSIK. 2003. 224 p.
Solopova M.А. Vita brevis: to the interpretation of the Hippocrate’s first aphorism [Vita brevis: k tolkovaniyu pervogo aforizma Gippokrata]. Journal of philosophy - Filosofskij zhurnal. 2012. №1. pp. 5–25.
Subbotin А.L. Classification [Klassifikatsiya]. Moscow:  IFRАN. 2001. 94 p.
Fragments of the ancient Greek philosophers[Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov]. Ed. by А.V. Lebedev.  Vol.I. Moscow: Nauka. 1989. 576 p.

Rickless S. Socrates’ Theory of Defintion. Available at: http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/faculty/rickless/Phil100/Phil100-Socratic Definition.htm (accessed 21.02.2016)

Full Text: