Publication Type:


Dimitris Kilakos
University of Athens
Issue number: 
No. 2 (Vol. 48)

Rockmore’s paper offers a nice discussion on how classical German idealism provides a plausible account of the Parmenidean insight that thought and being are identical and suggests that idealist epistemic constructivism is arguably the most promising approach to cognition. In this short commentary, I will explore the implications of adopting other interpretations of Parmenidean identity thesis, which arguably lead to different conclusions than the ones drawn by Rockmore. En route to disavow the distinction between ontology and epistemology, I argue that one may adopt an approach on cognition which would be immunized to worries that prompt Rockmore’s elaboration and also embrace (at least) some of its benefits.

identity, Parmenid, epistemic constructivism, idealism, cognition

Azeri S. Conceptual Cognitive Organs: Toward an Historical-Materialist Theory of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophia, 2013, no. 41. Pp. 1095-1123.

Bakhurst D. Il’enkov’s Hegel. Studies in Eastern European Thought , 2013,  no. 65. Pp. 271-285.

Brandom R. Making It Explicit. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.1994. 741p.

Burnet J. Early Greek Philosophy. London: Adam and Charles Black. 1930. 756p.

Burnyeat M.F. Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2012. 382p.

Fichte J. G. Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy (Wissenschaftslehre) Nova Methodo (1796/99). Cornell University Press. 1992. 494p.

Hegel G.W.F. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie I. In: G.W.F. Hegel, Werke in zwanzig  Bänden, vol.18, ed. by E. Moldenhauer and K.M. Michel. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. 1970. 698p.

Heidegger M. Introduction to Metaphysics (translated by G. Field and R. Polt). New Haven and London: Yale University Press. 2000. 255p.

Ilyenkov E. V. Dialectical Logic, Essays on its History and Theory. Moscow: Progress Publishers. 1977. 370p.

Kahn C. H. Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2009. 236p.

Knuutila T. Semiosis and the Concept of the Ideal. In: Oittinen, V. (ed.) Evald Ilyenkov's Philosophy Revisited. Helsinki: Kikimora Publications. 2000. pp. 189-204.

Lektorski V. Constructivism vs Realism. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2015, no.1, vol. 43, pp. 19-26.

McDowell J. Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1994. 224p.

Rorty R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979. 401p.

Tagliacozzo, G. (ed.). Vico and Marx, Affinities and Contrasts. Humanities Press. 438p.

Toulmin S. The construal of reality: criticism in modern and postmodern science. Critical Inquiry, vol. 9, no.1. Pp.  93–111.

Vico G.B. The First New Science (ed. and transl. by Leon Pompa). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002. 302p.

Wartofsky M. Models: Representations and the Scientific Understanding. Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol.48.  Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 1979. 24p.

Wartofsky M. The Model Muddle: Proposals for an Immodest Realism. In: Models: Representations and the Scientific Understanding. Boston studies in the philosophy of science , vol.48.  Dordrecht, Boston & London: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 1966/ 1979. P.1-11.

Full Text: