Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Na podstupakh k transgumanizmu
Lyudmila Markova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Science
Issue number: 
No. 1 (Vol. 47)

Social Epistemology today is argued to allow an adequate formulation of questions for exploring the issues in the process of scientific cognition. A formulation of such questions is claimed to have been impossible in the framework of classical thinking. One such issue is claimed to be the theme of transhumanism which moved from the realm of science fiction to the sphere of rational discussion. The author argues that today philosophers and scientists are discussing the question whether material objects, both natural and man-made, can think. Obviously, the author continues, we cannot assume that the thinking of man-made devices is human. Material carriers of programs also differ radically by the type of their materiality from the human body and brain. But, the man is also changing in his communication with the machine, adapting to it. The process of thinking itself is argued to have become different, especially given that an increasing number of organs of the human body are now replaced with artificial ones. The author states that today one of the central problems of philosophy is what would result from such humanization of machines and mechanization of humans. This problem is argued to be open. 

Transhumanism, artificial intellect, material carrier, human brain and body, man-made surrounding, society, nature, technology, science, scientific result, creativity

Deljoz Zh. Logika smysla (Deleuze G. Logique du sens). Moscow, 1998.

Dubrovskij D.I. Soznanie, mozg, iskusstvennyj intellect (Consciousness, brain, artificial intellect). Moscow, 2007.  

Makrova L.A. Nauka na grani s nenaukoj (Science on the edge of non-science). Moscow, 2013.

Mamardashvili M.K. Strela poznanija. Nabrosok estestvennoistoricheskoj gnoseologii (The arrow of cognition. A sketch of the epistemology of natural history). Moscow, 1996.

Markova L.A.  On Twenty-Five Years of Social Epistemology. A Way Forward. Problems of philosophy. Moscow, 2014, no.12.

Frodeman R. Anti-Fuller: Transhumanism and the Proactionary Imperative. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2015. Vol. 4, No 4, pp. 38-43.

Fuller S. Humanity 2.0.: What it Means to be Human Past, Present and Future. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012

Fuller S. Social epistemology: A quarter-century itinerary. Social Epistemology. 2012. vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 267-283.

Fuller S., Lipinska V. Transhumanism. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2014 Vol. 3, No. 11, 25-29. P.25.

Fuller, Lipinska, 2014b - Fuller S. and  Lipinska V. The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism. London, 2014.

Markova L.A. New people and a new type of communication.  Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2013,  Vol. 2, No. 11, pp. 47-53.

Markova L.A. Comments on Steve Fuller’s Presentation in Moscow. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2015, vol. 4, no. 2, p.1-4.

Palermos, Orestis and Duncan Pritcharfd , External Knowledge and Social Epistemology. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, vol.2, no.8, pp. 105-120.

Penrouz R. Teni razuma. V poiskah nauki o soznanii (Penrose R. Shadows of the Mind. A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness). Moscow - Izhevsk, 2005.

 Sandstrom G.  Extending Knowledge and the Extended Mind. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2014, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 34-37.

Sandstrom G. Reinventing Humanity with a New Sociological Imagination. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2014, vol. 3, no.10, pp. 56-61

Full Text: