Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Poznanie i ego agent v evolyutsionnoy epistemologii
Elina Lasitskaya
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No. 1 (Vol. 47)

The author investigates the content of the notion of subject from the evolutionary- epistemological point of view. She claims that evolutionary epistemology does not clarify this problem by itself and argues that this state of affairs raises a number of problems such as absolutization of adaptationism, biologism in knowledge, lack of a clear demarcation between animal cognition and human cognitive activity. It is argued that a man is the only subject of cognition in evolutionary epistemology. Inasmuch as person constructs and enriches the environment he becomes a pressure factor by himself. This claim is argued to counter the thesis of adaptation. So adaptationist interpretation of the evolution of human cognitive activity is insufficient. The phenomenon of environmental change through the development of cognitive abilities by the person is represented in society, communication and culture. Cognition is determined by anticipating the result of purpose. In this connection, the constructive activity of the cognitive person confronted with the limitations of her own cognitive capabilities and environmental restricting factors. Thus, the evolution of man is considered as self-development, which is carried out through the creative overcoming external and internal constraints through the constructive activity of the agent of cognition.

subject, cognition, construction, adaptation, evolution, training, constraint, creative, self-development

Aleksandrov Ju.I. Psihofizicheskoe znachenie aktivnosti central'nyh i perifericheskih nejronov v povedenii (Psychophysiological meaning of the activity of central and peripheral neurons in behavior). Moscow, 1989.

Amundson R. Two concepts of constraint: adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philosophy of Science, 1999, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 556-578.

Bazhanov V. Modern neuroscience and comprehension of subject of cognition nature in logico-epistemology studies (Sovremennaya kul'turnaya neyronauka i priroda sub"ekta poznaniya: logiko-epistemologicheskie izmereniya). Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki - Epistemology and Philosophy of science. Moscow, 2015, V. 45, no. 3, pp. 133-149.

Cardenas, M., Letelier, J., Gutierrez, C., Cornish-Bowden, A., Soto-Andrade, J. Closure to efficient causation, computability and artificial life.  Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2010 V. 263, no.1, pp. 79-92.

Christensen W.D., Hooker C.A. Autonomy and the emergence of intelligence:  Organized interactive construction. Communication and Cognition - Artificial Intelligence, 2000, vol. 17, no. 3-4, pp. 133-157.

Cohn, S. Making objective fact from intimate relations: the case of neuroscience and its entanglements with volunteers. History of The Human Sciences. 2008, vol. 21, pp. 86-103.

Craver, C. Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007. 329 p.

Darvin Ch. Proiskhozhdenie vidov putem estestvennogo otbora. (Darwin, Ch. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection). Leningrad, 1999.

Darvin Ch. Proiskhozhdenie cheloveka i polovoy otbor. (Darwin, Ch. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex).Vol. 5, Moscow, 1953.

Doydzh N. Plastichnost' mozga. (Doidge N. The Brain is Plastic). Moscow, 2011.

Fitzgerald, Des, Matusall, S,. Skewes, J,. Roepstorf, A. Whatʼs so critical about Critical Neuroscience? Rethinking experiment, enacting critique. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014, Vol. 8.   DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00365.

Kempbell D. Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya (Evolutionary epistemology). Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya: Antologiya. (Evolutionary epistemology: an anthology). Moscow, 2012,  pp. 141-178;

Knyazeva E.N. Physical and enactive cognition: a new research program (Telesnoe i enaktivnoe poznanie: novaya issledovatel'skaya programma). Epistemologiya: perspektivy razvitiya (Epistemology: prospects of development). Moscow, 2012. pp. 315-351.

Kwan, D,. Craver, C., Green, L., Myerson, J., Gao, F., Black, S., Rosenbaum, R. Cueing the Personal Future to Reduce Discounting in intertemporal Choice: Is Episodic Prospection Necessary? Hippocampus, 2015, vol. 25. pp. 432-443.

Lorents K. Po tu storonu zerkala (Lorenz K. Behind the Mirror). Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya: Antologiya (Evolutionary epistemology: an anthology). Moscow, 2012, pp.75-109.

Lorents K. Kantovskaya kontseptsiya a priori v svete sovremennoy biologii ( Lorenz K. Kant's Lehre vom Apriorichen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie). Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya: Antologiya (Evolutionary epistemology: an anthology). Moscow, 2012,  pp. 43-74.

Merkulov I.P. Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya (kognitivno-evolyutsionnyy podkhod) (Evolutionary epistemology (cognitive-evolutionary approach).Vol. 2, St.-Petersburg, 2006.

Petrenko V.F. Discussion (Diskussiya). Constructivism in the theory of knowledge (Konstruktivizm v teorii poznaniya). Moscow, 2008;

Rubinshteyn S.L. Chelovek i mir (Man and world). Problems of General psychology (Problemy obshchey psikhologii). Moscow, 1973. pp. 253-385;

Soto-Andrade, J., Jaramillo, S., Gutierrez, Cl., Letelier, J-C. Ouroboros avatars: A mathematical exploration of Self-reference and Metabolic Closur. MIT Press. Boston, 2015. pp. 763-770;

Tsokolov S.A. The discourse of radical constructivism (Diskurs radikal'nogo konstruktivizma). Munich. 2000;

Varela F., Maturana U. Drevo poznaniya. Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo poznaniya. (Varela, F.J., Maturana, H. The tree of human understanding) Moscow, 2001;

Vuketich F. M. Evolyutsiya i poznanie. Paradigmy, perspektivy, problem (Evolution and cognition. Paradigms, perspectives, problems) Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya: Antologiya (Evolutionary epistemology: an anthology). Moscow, 2012, pp. 275-314.


Full Text: