Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Epistemologicheskiy konstruktivizm i problema global'nogo nablyudatelya
Diana Gasparyan
National Research University – Higher School of Economics
Issue number: 
No. 1 (Vol. 47)

Discussions related to the detection of objective reality, the truth and lie are still a heated topic in the domain of philosophical epistemology. While certain philosophical contexts and theories suggest that the notion “reality as an independent category” should not be engaged, instead, interpretations, including reciprocal, should be used, others hold it that philosophical discussion cannot continue without reference to the said notion. Different philosophers and scolars approach this problem from different angles. When discussing these topics, philosophers often resort to certain thought experiments, engaging an important concept, which can broadly be identified as “the global observer.” This concept has something in common with such concepts as the God’s Eye (Putnam H.), Omniscient Interpreter (Davidson D.), Ultimate Observer (quantum physics), Agent of logical omniscience (game theories), Ideal Observer (ethics and meta-ethics), God (analytic theology). Despite the abundance of works on the topic and scrupulosity of arguments, there still remain many uncertainties in such discussions, mostly related to a great number of logical paradoxes, associated with the problem. Therefore, in view of the current situation, the focus of the research paper is on the deliberation of consistency of the notion “global observer” from the standpoint of logic and philosophy. The results of the analysis of the issue at stake are expected to clarify the notion and to enrich current discussions on the topic.  I examine certain difficulties in the philosophical assumptions concerning one of the philosophical concepts, which could be collectively named as the “global observer.” The article below explores the notion of the global observer as the guarantor of the determinability and configuration of events in the world. There is explained the meaning of this concept and attempt to show that, despite variations in the wording, it is used in many philosophical contexts related to epistemology. The core issue of the present research paper is the analysis of the consistency of the notion “global observer” from the standpoint of logic and philosophy. The paper discusses why application of this notion in some contexts poses challenges and appears to be paradoxical.  

epistemology, epistemological constructivism, global observer, global observation, local observer, local observation, event, the truth

Bateson, 1987 - Bateson G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New Jersey, London: Jason Aronson Inc. 1987. 

Brueckner, 1999 - Brueckner A. The Super-Omniscient Interpreter. Philosophical Quarterly. vol. 50, pp. 526-528.

Davidson, 2001a - Davidson D. Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.  Davidson D. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.2001.

Davidson, 2001 b - Davidson D.  Epistemology Externalized. Davidson D. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.2001.

Davidson, 1969 - Davidson D. The Individuation of Events. N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 216–34.

Foerster, PÖrksen, 1998 - Foerster von H., Pörksen В. Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners: Gespräche für Skeptiker. 2. Auf. Heidelberg, 1998. S. 121

Foerster, 1981 - Foerster H.v.  Observing Systems. Seaside:  Intersystems. 1981.

Foerster, 1984 – Foerster  H.v. On Constructing a Reality. The Invented Reality. Paul Watzlawick (ed.). New York: Norton. pp. 41-63. 

Foerster, PÖrsken, 2002 – Foerster H.v., PÖrsken B. Understanding Systems. Conversations on Epistemology and Ethics. Heidelberg, New York: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag,Kluwer Academic Publication, Plenum Publishers. 2002. P. 148

Richmond, 2009 -  Richmond F. The Ultimate  Observer: Quantum Physics and God. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. 2009.

Glasersfeld, 1990 - Glasersfeld E. von. An Exposition of Constructivism. Why Some Like it Radical. Monographs of the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.  R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, N. Noddings (eds.), no. 4. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1990, pp.19-29.

Grim, 1985 - Grim P. Against Omniscience: The Case from Essential Indexicals. Noûs, 1985, vol. 19, pp. 151–180.

Grim, Platinga, 1993 - Grim P., Plantinga A., Truth, Omniscience, and Cantorian Arguments. Philosophical Studies, 1993, vol. 71, pp. 267–306.

Klein, 1986 - Klein P. D. Radical Interpretation and Global Skepticism. Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. E.Lepore (ed.). Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 369-386. 1986.

Lockwood, 1996 - Lockwood M. Many Minds Interpretations of quantum mechanics. The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 1996, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 159-188..

Lombard, 1986 - Lombard L. B. Events: a Metaphysical Study. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.1986.

Luhmann,1990 -  Luhmann N. Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press. 1990.

Luhmann, 1995 - Luhmann N. The Paradox of Observing Systems. Cultura Critique, no. 31, The Politics of Systems and Environments, 1995, pp. 37–55.

Manning, 1995 - Manning  R. N. Interpreting Davidson's Omniscient Interpreter Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 25, no. 3, 1995, pp. 335-374. 

Martins, 2009 - Martins A. C. R. Theoretical Omniscience: Old Evidence or New Theory. PhilSci preprint available at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002458

Nathaniel, 2003 - Nathaniel G. Possibly V. Actually the Case: Davidson's Omniscient Interpreter at Twenty. Acta Analytica, vol. 18, no.1-2, pp.143-160. 2003.

Neisser, 1976 - Neisser U. Cognition and Reality. Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco, 1976, p. 75.

PÖrksen, 2004a - PÖrksen B. The Certainty of Uncertainty: Dialogues Introducing Constructivism. London: Imprint Academic. 2004. p.3.

PÖrksen , 2004b – Pörksen B. The Circular View of the World. PÖrksen B.The Certainty of Uncertainty: Dialogues Introducing Constructivism. London: Imprint Academic, 2004.

Putnam, 1990 - Putnam H. Realism with a Human Face.  Realism with a Human Face. Conant J. (ed.). Harvard University Press. Camb., Mass., pp. 3-29.

Putnam, 2007 - Putnam H. Truth and Convention: On Davidson's Refutation of Conceptual Relativism. Dialectica, 2007, vol. 41, no.1-2, pp. 69–77.

Rockmore, 2005 - Rockmore T. On Constructivist Epistemology. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 2005.

Segal, 1986 - Segal L. The Dream of Reality Heinz von Foerster’s Constructivism. New York: 

Norton, 1986.

Siderius, 2011– Siderius E. Donna Haraway and Hilary Putnam on God’s Spectacles. available at: https://edmundsiderius.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/donna-haraway-and-hilary-putnam-on-gods-spectacles/

Silcox, 2001 - Silcox M. On the Conceivability of an Omniscient Interpreter. Dialogue, 2001, vol.46 , no.4, pp. 627-636.

Stalnaker, 1991 – Stalnaker  R. The problem of logical omniscience, I. Synthese, 1991, vol. 89, pp. 425-440.

Swinburne, 1993 - Swinburne R. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.

Ward, 2006 - Ward A. Skepticism and Davidson’s Omniscient Interpreter Argument. Critica, vol. 21, no.61, April.

Zeh, 2000 - Zeh H.D. The problem of conscious observation in Quantum Mechanical Description. Epistemological Letters of the Ferdinand-Gonseth Association in Biel (Switzerland) Letter No 63.0.1981.

Zeh, 2003 - Zeh, H.D. Chapter 2: Basic Concepts and their Interpretation.Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, second edition. New York: Springer, 2003.


Full Text: