Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Kritika reformy RAN uchenymi i bazovye cennosti rossijskoj nauki
Nikolai Rozov
Institute for philosophy and law , Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences Novosibirsk State Technological University
Issue number: 
No. 4 (Vol. 46)

Since the autumn of 2013 the scientific community in Russia has been expressing anxiety and dismay. The discontent is articulated at conferences in numerous publications. Analysis of typical criticisms of the reform of the RAS reveals underlying scientists' ideas about organization of Russian science and proper directions of its development. To assess these judgments about the reforms the basic values about science and theoretical foundation are needed. Priority should be given to the following ones: a) the intrinsic value of knowledge and the growth of scientific knowledge, of development of philosophical thinking; b) openness and freedom of intellectual exchange, communication links, the unacceptability of scientific and educational exclusion; c) science must respond to the requests of social groups and strata,  to the needs of the economy and the business, to public requests from both the central government and the regional authorities. The ideal of national science is considered as an imaginary model that meets the values stated above There are tactical problems related to current government policy, legal and administrative conditions, that should not replace the long-term strategic goals, based on the fundamental values of science and modern social theories of creativity and cultural production. If the strategic vision of the development of Russian science should take into account the principles of the plurality of network centers, the institutionalization of crossing networks and competitiveness, transparency, financial and administrative autonomy of research centers, multiple channels of support and funding, the tactical objectives should be focused on minimizing the damage to the research teams in the current circumstances, as well as on finding ways to promote strategic objectives.

reform of Russian Academy of Sciences, science as institution, the values of science, national science, intellectual networks, bureaucratization of management of science, research schools

Fradkov A.  The bureaucratization as a way to smash science and to stifle researchers (Biurokratizatsiya kak sposob razgroma naki i udusheniya uchonykh). Troitsky variant, 02.06.2015, no. 180, cp. 4-5. URL:

Guidelines for the distribution of subsidies provided to the federal public institutions that perform works in the field of scientific and technical activities. (Metodicheskie rekomendacii po raspredeleniju subsidij, predostavljaemyh federal'nym gosudarstvennym uchrezhdenijam, vypolnjajushhim gosudarstvennye raboty v sfere nauchnoj (nauchno-issledovatel'skoj) i nauchno-tehnicheskoj dejatel'nosti). Russian Ministry of Education 2015. URL:

Ivanov V. With Blitzkrieg against science (Blitskrigom po nauke). Nezavisimaya gazeta,  16.06.2015. URL:

Klein L. The destiny of the Academy and the destiny of the country (Sud’ba akademii i sud’ba strany). Troitsky variant, 13.08.2014, no. 135, p. 12,

Letarov A. FANO and the principles of goal setting in science (FANO i printsipy tselepolaganiya v nauke). Troitsky variant, 05.05.2015, no. 178, p. 6-7. URL:

Mitina D. The crib of academician Polterovitch: concisely and comprehensively about the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences  (Shpargalka akademika Polterovitcha – szhato i ischerpyvaiushche o reforme RAN ). Russky obozrevatel’, 01.09.2013 URL:

Problems and tasks of the 3-rd conference of researchers (Problemy I zadachi 3-ei konferentsii nauchnyh rabotnikov)… Troitsky variant, no.179, 19.05.2015.  URL:

Pshenichnov I. Let’s come back to our … ants (Verniomsia k nashim… muraviam). Troitsky variant, 02.06.2015, no. 180, p. 5. URL:

Reform of science: the algorithm of success (Reforma nauki: algoritm uspekha). URL:

Resolution of the Scientific council of the Institute for Philosophy RAS, 12.05.2015 (Rezoliutsiya uchonogo soveta Instituta filosofii RAN, 12.05.2015). URL:

Rozov, Nikolai S. Values in the problematic world: philosophical foundations and social applications of constructive axiology (Tsennosti v problemnom mire: filosofskie osnovaniya i sotsial’nye prilozheniya konstruktivnoi aksiologii). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 1998.

Shkredov I. The Mathematics: impossibility of planning, coercion and control (Matematika: nevozmozhnost’ planirovaniya, prinuzhdeniya i kontrolia). Troitsky variant, 02.06.2015, no. 180, p. 1.

Full Text: