Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Sovmestima li evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya nauki s nauchnym realizmom?
Ivan Kuzin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Issue number: 
No. 4 (Vol. 46)

Classical, selectionist (adaptationist) evolutionary epistemology of science draws an analogy between development of science and natural selection. But natural selection immediately increases only the relative fitness of organisms with regard to specific and changing environment. Therefore evolutionary epistemology of science is exploited (by van Fraassen in particular) against scientific realism which presumes existence of absolute scientific progress as an approach to truth. In modern biology in order to explain absolute evolutionary progress nonadaptationist, nonselectionist models based on a passive trend mechanism (a random walk limited by walls) were worked out, the ratchet model in particular. This paper suggests nonadaptationist extension of evolutionary epistemology of science, namely the ratchet model of scientific progress and illustrates it by history of thermodynamics. This model enables to combine realistic concept of scientific progress as an approach to truth with antirealistic concept of scientific development as an improvement of problem-solving ability: the former is ascribed to scientific dynamics on a global scale and the latter on a  local.

adaptationism, evolutionary epistemology, evolutionary progress, scientific progress, scientific realism, B. van Fraassen

Allchin D. Error types. Perspectives on Science. 2001. Vol. 9. no. 1. С. 38-58.

Brodyanskiy V.M. Vechnyy dvigatel' – prezhde i teper'. Ot  utopii – k nauke, ot nauki – k utopii (Perpetual motion then and now. From utopia to science, from science to utopia). Moscow, 1989.

Chakravartty A. Scientific realism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 edition) / E.N. Zalta (ed.), URL:

Čápek V., Sheehan D.P. Challenges to the second law of thermodynamics. Dordrecht, 2005.

Dennett D.C. Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York, 1995.

Evolutionary epistemology, language and culture. A non-adaptationist, systems theoretical approach / Gontier N., Van Bendegem J.P., Aerts D. (eds.). Dordrecht, 2006.

Fursov A.A. Problema statusa teoreticheskogo znaniya nauki v polemike mezhdu realizmom i antirealizmom (The problem of status of theoretical knowledge in polemics between realism and antirealism). Moscow, 2013.

Gabbey A. The mechanical philosophy and its problems. Change and progress in modern science. Dordrecht, 1985, pp. 9-84.

Gontier N. Introduction to evolutionary epistemology, language and culture. Evolutionary epistemology, language and culture. A non-adaptationist, systems theoretical approach. Dordrecht, 2006, pp. 1-29.

Gott V.S. Filosofskie voprosy sovremennoy fiziki (Philosophical questions of modern physics). Moscow, 1972.

Gould S.J. Full house: the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. Cambridge,  London, 2011.

Gray M.W.,  Lukeš J., Archibald J.M., Keeling P.J.,  Doolittle W.F Irremediable Complexity? Science, 2010, vol. 330, no. 920, pp. 920-921.

 Guld S.Dzh., Levontin R.Ch. “Pazukhi svoda sobora Svyatogo Marka i paradigma Panglossa: kritika adaptatsionistskoy programmy” (Gould S.J., Lewontin R.C. “The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme”). Filosofiya. Nauka. Gumanitarnoe znanie (Philosophy. Science. Humanitarian knowledge). Moscow, 2014, pp. 160-191.

Hahlweg K., Hooker C.A. Evolutionary epistemology and philosophy of science. New issues in evolutionary epistemology. New York, 1989, pp. 21-150.

Hull D.L. Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, 1988. 

Kitcher P. The advancement of science: science without legend, objectivity without illusions. New York, Oxford, 1993.

Khramov A.V. Are naturalized epistemology and evolutionism compatible? (Sovmestimy li naturalizovannaya epistemologiya i evolyutsionizm?) Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2013, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 161-177.

Knoll A.H., Bambach R.K. Directionality in the history of life: diffusion from the left wall or repeated scaling of the right? Paleobiology, 2000, vol. 26, no. 4, supplement, pp. 1-14.

Knyazeva E.N. “Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya v retrospektive i perspektive. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya” (“Evolutionary epistemology in retrospect and perspective. An introductionary article”). Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. Moscow, 2012, pp. 7-38.

Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy (Kuhn T.S. The structure of scientific revolutions). Moscow, 2003.

Kuzin I.A. “Spandrels” by Gould and Lewontin and a critique of adaptationism (“Spandrels…” Gulda i Levontina i kritika adaptatsionizma). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 7. Filosofiya (Moscow University Bulletin. Ser. 7. Philosophy), 2015, no 3, pp. 3-18.

Laudan L. Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. London, 1977.

Laudan L. A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of science, 1981, vol. 48, pp. 19-49.

Maynard Smith J., Szathmáry E. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford, New York, Heidelberg, 1995.

McShea D.W. Possible largest-scale trends in organismal evolution: Eight "live hypotheses". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1998, vol. 29, pp. 293-318.

Park S. On the evolutionary defense of scientific antirealism. Axiomathes, 2014, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 263-273.

Popper K.R. Ob"ektivnoe znanie. Evolyutsionnyy podkhod (Popper K.R. Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach). Moscow, 2002.

Psillos S. Scientific realism: how science tracks truth. London, New York, 1999.

Riegler A. The cognitive ratchet – the ratchet effect as a fundamental principle in evolution and cognition. Cybernetics & Systems, 2001, vol. 32, no. 3-4, pp. 411-427.

Rosenberg A., McShea D.W. Philosophy of biology: a contemporary introduction. New York, 2007.

Ruse M. Monad to man: the concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Cambridge, London, 2009.

Schaffer S. The show that never ends: perpetual motion in the early eighteenth century. The British journal for the history of science, 1995, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 157-189.

Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie (Theoretical knowledge). Moscow, 2003.

Tomasello M. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, London, 1999.

Tulmin St. Chelovecheskoe ponimanie (Toulmin S.E. Human understanding). Moscow, 1984.

van Fraassen B.C. The scientific image. New York, 1980.

Wray K.B. A selectionist explanation for the success and failures of science. Erkenntnis, 2007, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 81-89.

Wray K.B. Selection and predictive success. Erkenntnis, 2010, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 365-377.

Full Text: