INTENTION, ACTION, RESPONSIBILITY

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Namerenie, deystvie, otvetstvennost'
Author(s): 
Vitaly Ogleznev
Tomsk State University
Issue number: 
No. 3 (Vol. 45)
Pages: 
199-209
Abstract: 

The paper investigates the way in which criminal law of most countries allocates to the idea of intention, as one of the principal determinants of liability to punishment. All civilized penal systems make liability to punishment for at any rate serious crime dependent not merely on the fact that the person to be punished has done the outward act of a crime, but on his having done it in a certain state of frame of mind. These mental or intellectual elements are many and various and are collected together in the legal terminology under the description of a guilty mind. But the most prominent, of these mental elements, and in many ways the most important, is a man’s intention. The law’s concern with intention generates a number of problems, some of which are discussed in this paper. It is argued that even before one reaches these problems there is a more fundamental question to be addressed: what is a man’s intention? This is a question which, quite apart from the law, philosophers have found both intriguing and difficult to answer. The author discusses how it can add complexity to what is considered intentional in criminal law.

Keywords: 
intention, action, responsibility, decision, certainty, uncertainty
References: 

Bayles M.D. Hart’s Legal Philosophy: An Examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.

Boden M.A. In Reply to Hart and Hampshire. Mind, New Series, 1959, Vol. 68, No. 270, pp. 256-260.

Borisov E.V., Ladov V.A., Surovtsev V.A. Language, mind, world. Essays on comparative analysis of phenomenology and analytical philosophy (Yazyk, Soznanie, Mir. Ocherki komparativnogo analiza fenomenologii i analiticheskoy filosofii). Vilnius, 2010.

Coffey G. Codifying the Meaning of “Intention” in the Criminal Law. The Journal of Criminal Law, 2009, No. 73, pp. 394-413.

Diev V.S. Criteria for selection of alternatives: the rational model and real solutions (Kriterii vybora al'ternativ: ratsional'nye modeli i real'nye resheniya). Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya – Journal of Novosibirsk State University. Philosophy, 2012, No. 1(10), pp. 5-12.

Esakov G.A. Intention in England criminal law (Namerenie v angliyskom ugolovnom prave). Lex Russica, 2005, Vol. LXIV, No, 3, pp. 576-591.

Fletcher G.P. The Fall and Rise of Criminal Theory. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 1998, Vol. 1, No, 2. P. 275-294.

Hampshire S., Hart H.L.A. Decision, Intention, and Certainty. Mind, 1958, Vol. 67, pp. 1-12.

Hart H.L.A. Ascription of responsibility and rights (Pripisyvanie otvetstvennosti i prav). Pravovedenie – Jurisprudence, 2010, No. 5(292), pp. 116-135.

Hart H.L.A. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Second Edition. Oxford University Press, 2008.

Hart H.L.A. Signs and Words. The Philosophical Quarterly, 1952, Vol. 2, pp. 59-62.

Levin S.M. Prior intentions and the problem of wayward causation (Predvaritel'nye namereniya i problema zabludshey prichinnosti). Filosofiya nauki – Philosophy of science, 2014, No. 3(62), pp. 30-41.

Ogleznev V.V. Intentionality in Herbert Hart’s legal philosophy (Intentsional'nost' v filosofii prava Gerberta Kharta). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Journal of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science, 2011, No. 2(14), pp. 160-166.

Ogleznev V.V., Surovtsev V.A. H. Hart’s analytical legal philosophy and legal realism (Analiticheskaya filosofiya prava G. Kharta i pravovoy realism). Pravovedenie – Jurisprudence, 2013, No. 4(309), pp. 134-147.

Parsons S. Intention in Criminal Law: Why Is It So Difficult to Find? Mountbatten Journal of Legal Studies, 2000, No. 4, pp. 5-19.

Ryle G. Concept of mind (Ponyatie soznaniya). Moscow, 1999.

Stern K. Mr. Hampshire and Professor Hart on Intention: A Note. Mind, New Series, 1959, Vol. 68, No. 269, pp. 98-99.

Zaibert & Smith, 2007 – Zaibert L., Smith B. “The Varieties of Normativity: An Essay on Social Ontology”. Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle’s Social Ontology, Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. pp. 157-175.

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201545384
Full Text: