Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Filosofskaja «jazykovaja igra»: problema professional'noj kommunikacii
Elena Zolotukhina-Abolina
Southern Federal University
Issue number: 
No. 3 (Vol. 45)

The paper discusses professional communication among philosophers. The author argues that starting from the second half of the twentieth century atomization of philosophical languages has begun. Philosopher are argued to have been creating their own speech on the basis of subjective associations, exclusively personal vision, not directly related to existing intellectual tradition; they would use their own terms and concepts without proper definitions or clarification. The author addresses the major ideological changes in the intellectual and cultural life of the twentieth century (the secularization and the rejection of metaphysical issues) as the core reasons for the radical «change» and the individualization of the philosophical language.

Metaphorization by subjective associations; camouflaging of mystical_religious terms for the secular term; the desire to speak, avoiding the subject_object distinction and metaphysical references; essayistic style of writing are claimed to be the most characteristic properties of what is dubbed as «the philosophical language game of the second half of the twentieth century». The reality produced is fruitful for various hermeneutic interpretations, but at the same time the ideas that philosophers attempt to convey to their colleagues become very hard to grasp.

philosophical language game, communication, interpretation, subjectivization, universal validity, understanding, deconstruction

Adorno T.V. Zhargon podlinnosti. O nemeckoj ideologii [Jargon of Authenticity. On the German Ideology] M., 2011.191 p.

AhutinA. Dasein (Materialy k tolkovaniju) [Materials to interpretation] //Logos 2000 № 5-6 (26)  http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2000_5_6/2000_5-6_10.htm  - 10.12.2014

Averincev S. Predvaritel'nye zametki k izucheniju srednevekovoj jestetiki. Drevnerusskoe iskusstvo [The Preliminary Notes to the Study of Medieval Aesthetics. The Ancient Russian Art ] Moskva, 1975. Pp. 149-164. http://ec-dejavu.ru/a-2/Aesthetics.html  (17 dekabrja 2014).

Barri S. K neperevodimosti nemeckoj filosofii [To Untranslatability of German Philosophy] Logos 2000 № 5-6 (26) http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2000_5_6/2000_5-6_10.htm - 10.12.2014

D'jakov A. Zhak Lakan. Figura filosofa [Figure of the Philosopher] M., 2010. 560 p.

Grigor'eva N. Animalaborans Sankt-Peterburg, 2005.  – 294 p.

Jaspers K. Filosofija Kn.2 Prosvetlenie jekzistencii [Philosophy (Book 2) Enlightenment of Existence] M., 2012. 448 p.

Mareeva E., Mareev S. Problema myshlenija: sozercatel'nyj i dejatel'nostnyj podhod [The problem of thinking: the contemplative and the active approach] M.,  2013.  280 p.

Nalimov V. Verojatnostnaja model' jazyka [Probabilistic Model of Language] Tomsk-Moscow   2003. 368 p.

Neretina S., Ogurcov A. Puti k universalijam [Ways to Universals] Sankt-Petersburg., 2006. 1000 p.

Zolotuhina-Abolina E .M.Hajdegger i K.Jaspers: inoskazanie o Boge . Jekzistencial'naja filosofija vchera i segodnja. [M. Heidegger and Karl Jaspers: an Allegory of God. Existential Philosophy Yesterday and Today.]  Moskva, 2014. 160 p.

Full Text: