BELIEF CONTENT AND BELIEF STATE

Publication Type:

Language:

Author(s): 
Alexei Cherniak
People's Friendship University of Russia
Issue number: 
No. 3 (Vol. 45)
Pages: 
98-117
Abstract: 

The paper is dedicated to the analysis of a contribution of the distinction between states and contents of beliefs to the explanation of changes of beliefs in some specific situations such as changed stakes or evidence. The plausible idea about beliefs is that an agent may have two different beliefs in the same proposition representing different relations to that proposition – belief states. Different accounts of states of beliefs were proposed. The claim critically observed in the paper is that a change of belief may be explained as a change of either proposition believed or state of belief. It is argued that explanations of changes of beliefs in terms of changes in their states are reducible to explanations in terms of changes in their propositional contents. In particular it is argued that cases where changing beliefs are expressed by sentences with so called essential indexicals, which are considered to be cases of changing belief states, but not propositions, may be described as rather instances of changing belief's propositional contents. There is also the account of belief as triadic relation between believer, believed propositions and mode of its presentation by believers. According to it belief change may be represented as a change of the mode of presentation which preserves propositional content of the belief. Against this account it is argued that modes of presentation of propositions either does not in fact contribute to semantic contents of corresponding beliefs or may be assimilated by their propositional contents. It seems plausible that to be relevant to the belief change the information is to be at least available to a competent reflexive agent of the belief, and this information then may be added to a propositional content of that belief after some reflection.

Keywords: 
belief, proposition, state, semantic content, degree of belief, evidence, mode of presentation, direct reference, essential indexical
References: 

Perry, J. "The problem of Essential Indexical", Noûs V.13, № 1, 1979

Frege, G. "Sense and Reference" (1892). The Philosophical Review, Vol. 57, No. 3, 1948, pp. 209-230

McKay T., Nelson M. "Propositional Attitude Reports" in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (www.plato.stanford.edu), 2010

Russell, B. "Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 108-28, 1910

Russell, B. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1912

Kaplan, D. "Demonstratives" (1977) in J. Almog, J. Perry, H. and Wettstein (eds.). Themes from Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 481-563

Foley, R. “Beliefs, Degrees of Belief, and the Lockean Thesis”, F.Huber and C. Schmidt-Petri(Eds.), Degrees of Belief, Synthese Library: 2009

Ramsey, F.P. "Truth and Probability", in Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays, London: Routledge& Kegan Paul, 1931

Jeffrey, R. The Logic of Decision, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983

Lewis, D. "A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance", in R. Jeffrey (ed.) Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, vol. 2, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980

Perry, J. "Rip Van Winkle and other characters".  The European Review of AnalyticalPhilosophy 2, 1997: 13-39

Fantl, J. McGrath, M. Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009

Stanley, J. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005

Weatherson, B. “Defending Interest-Relative Invariantism,” Logos & Episteme 2, 2011: 591-609

Reed, B. ‘‘A Defense of Stable Invariantism’’, Noûs 44, 2010: 224–44

Richard, M. "Direct Reference and Ascriptions of Belief", Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1983

Schiffer, S. "Naming and Knowing". P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 2, 28-41. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977

Crimmins, M., and J. Perry. "The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs". Journal of Philosophy 86, 1989: 685-711

Récanati, F., Crimmins, M. "Quasi-Singular Propositions: The Semantics of Belief Reports". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, Vol. 69, 1995

Quine, W.v.O. "Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes". Journal of Philosophy 53,1956: 177-87

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201545378
Full Text: