Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Ponyatie a priori v filosofii logicheskogo jempirizma i ego pervye kritiki
Tatiana Sokolova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No. 3 (Vol. 45)

The philosophy of logical empiricism has largely determined the direction and the range of problems of philosophy, which later became known as analytic philosophy. Philosophers of the Vienna Circle and their followers had to dissociate their program from the dominant in the early twentieth century philosophies (particularly neo-Kantianism and neo-Hegelianism). As a part of this task the revision of the concepts of classical epistemology, including the concept of a priori has been carried out. The paper examines how, in the framework of logical empiricism, apriority became identified with analyticity, and discusses alternative theories of the a priori, which were a result of this identification.

a priori, analyticity, logical empiricism, synthetic a priori, functional a priori

Austin J. Are there a priori concepts? (Suschestvujut li apriornye ponjatija?). Austin J. Three Ways of S. Spilling Ink. S-Pb., 2006. Pp. 57-75.

Ayer A.J. A Priori. Ayer A. J. Language, truth, and logic (Jazyk, istina i logika). M., 2010.

BonJour L. In defense of pure reason: a rationalist account of a priori justification. Cambridge, New York, 1998.

Brandom R. Kantian Lessons about Mind, Meaning, and Rationality. Philosophical Topics. 2006. Vol. 34, № 1&2.

Carnap R. Meaning Postulates. Carnap R. Meaning and Necessity (Znachenie i neobhodimost'). M., 1959. Pp. 321-330.

Carnap R. Philosophical Foundations of Physics (Filosofskie osnovanija fiziki: Vvedenie v filosofiju nauki). M., 2008.

Christopoulou D., Psillos S. The A Priori: Between Conventions and Implicit Definitions. Kompa N., Nimtz Ch., Suhm Ch. (eds). The A Priori and its Role in Philosophy. Paderborn, 2009. P. 205-220

Cohen M., Nagel E. Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method (Vvedenie v logiku i naučnyj metod). Chelyabinsk, 2010.

Dolgorukov V.V. “In Defence of a Dogma”: Grice and Strawson vs Quine («V zaščitu dogmy»: Grajs i Stroson protiv Kuajna). Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2012. №2. Pp. 201-205.

Engel P. Quine et le retour de l’a priori. Lire Quine. Paris, 2006. P. 159-184.

Grice H.P., Strawson P.F. In defence of a Dogma (V zaščitu dogmy). Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2012. №2. Pp. 206-223.

Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. Sochineniya v 6 tt (Works in 6 vols.). T. 3. M., 1964. Pp. 105-106.

Mormann T. Toward a Theory of the Pragmatic A Priori: From Carnap to Lewis and Beyond. Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. 2012. Vol. 16.

Pap A. Logic and the Synthetic A Priori. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1950. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 500-514.

Pap A. On the Meaning of Necessity. The Journal of Philosophy. 1943. Vol. 40, № 17. Р. 449-458.

Pap A. On the Meaning of Universality. The Journal of Philosophy. 1943. Vol. 40, №. 19. Р. 505-514.

Pap A. Once More: Colors and the Synthetic A Priori. The Philosophical Review. 1957. Vol. 66, № 1. Р. 94-99.

Pap A. Semantika i neobxodimaja istina. M., 2002.

Pap A. The Different Kinds of A Priori. The Philosophical Review. 1944. Vol. 53, № 5. Р. 474.

Quine W.V.O. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Quine W.V.O. From a Logical Point of View (S točki zrenija logiki: 9 logiko-filosofskix očerkov). Tomsk, 2003.

Russel B. Problems of Philosophy (Problemy filosofii). James W. Introduction to Philosophy (Vvedenie v filosofiju); Russel B. Problems of Philosophy (Problemy filosofii). M., 2000.

Reichenbach H. The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Oakland, 1965.

Schlick M. Epistemology and Modern Physics. Schlick M. Philosophical Papers. Volume II (1925-1936). Dordrect, 1979.

Stoliarova O.E. Two faces of apriorism (Dva litsa apriorizma). Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2012. № 4. Pp. 42-58.