WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A TRANSCENDENTALIST IN CONTEMPORARY ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY OF MIND?

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Chto znachit byt' transcendentalistom v sovremennoy analiticheskoy filosofii soznaniya
Author(s): 
Diana Gasparyan
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Issue number: 
No. 2 (Vol. 44)
Pages: 
146-165
Abstract: 

In this study I would like to demonstrate what is like to be a transcendentalist t in contemporary analytic philosophy of mind. At the same time I will explore in what sense transcendentalism is opposed to naturalism. Next, I will consider the examples of transcendentalist theories as the approaches in contemporary analytic philosophy, namely the theory of K. McGinn, J. Levin and N. Chomsky. In addition, I will show, what is the proportion the negative and positive components in these approaches, and will stipulate the role of the skeptical position in their theories.

Keywords: 
transcendentalism, analytical philosophy of mind, skepticism, K. McGinn, J. Levin, N. Chomsky
References: 

Allison H. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.

Alter T., Walter S. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Baker L.R. Can Subjectivity Be Naturalized? // Metodo: International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy(forthcoming).

Baker L.R. Does Naturalism Rest on a Mistake? // American Philosophical Quarterly. 2011Vol. 48. № 2.

Bell D. Transcendental Arguments and Non-Naturalistic Anti-Realism. Transcendental arguments: Problems and prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Cassam Q. Can Transcendental Epistemology be Naturalised? // The Philosophical Review. 2009. Vol. 90.

Chalmers D. Soznayuschiy um. V poiskakh fundamentalnoy filosofii. (Chalmers D. Conscious Mind. Search of Fundamenral Theory). Moscow, URSS, 2013. 758 p.

Chomsky N. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge, 2000.

Franks P. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.

Gasparyan D.E. In defense of phenomenal consciousness: arguments against physicalism in contemporary analytic philosophy, part 1 (V zaschitu fenomenalnogo soznaniya: argumenti protiv fisikalozma v sovremennoy analiticheskoy filosofii, chast 1). Filosofskiye problemi informacionikh technologiy i kiberprostranstva. 2014. no.1. pp. 43-55.

Gasparyan D.E. In defense of phenomenal consciousness: arguments against physicalism in contemporary analytic philosophy, part 2 (V zaschitu fenomenalnogo soznaniya: argumenti protiv fisikalozma v sovremennoy analiticheskoy filosofii, chast 2). Filosofskiye problemi informacionikh technologiy i kiberprostranstva. 2014. no.1. pp. 52-85.

Gasser G. Naturalism and the First-Person Perspective. How Successful is Naturalism? Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2007.

Hookway C. Modest Transcendental Arguments and Sceptical Doubts: A Reply to Stroud // Stern. 1999. Vol. 76.

Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. Sochineniya, T.2 (Kant I. Kritik der reinen Vernunft). Moscow, 1994. 433 p.

Kim J. What is "Naturalised Epistemology"? // Philosophical Perspectives. 1988. Vol. 2.

Kitcher P. The Naturalists Return // Philosophical Review. 1992. Vol. 101.

Levine J. Materialism and qualia: the explanatory gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

McGinn C. Mysterious Flame: Conscious Minds in a Material World. N. Y., 1999.

O’Dea, J. The indexical nature of sensory concepts // Philosophical Papers. 2002. Vol. 31. № 2.

Papineau D. Philosophical Naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.

Russell B. An Outline of Philosophy. London, N.Y. (repr.), 2009.

Shopengauer A. Mir kak volya i predstavleniye. Sobraniya. (Schopenhauer A. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Т. 1. Moscow, 1992

Skorupski J. The Intelligibility of Scepticism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.

Smith J., Sullivan P. Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Stern R. Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism: Answering the Question of Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Vasilyev V.V. Soznaniye i veschi (consciousness and entities). Moscow, URSS, 2013. 258 p.

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201544215
Full Text: