JUSTIFICATION OF JUSTIFICATION: THE CASE OF TECHNO STUDIES

Publication Type:

Language:

Author(s): 
Hans Poser
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Issue number: 
No. 1 (Vol. 43)
Pages: 
54-66
Abstract: 

A fruitful analysis of the structure of the natural sciences has been carried out by V. Stepin. The leading question of this paper focuses on whether it is possible to use this structure for the techno sciences as well. In order to compare both sides of the argument, I have developed the Basic Rules – a somewhat differing set of commitments for the sciences. These allow discussing the structural elements of a special science and comprise methodological commitments relating to 1. ontology, 2. sources of knowledge, 3. hierarchy of knowledge sources, 4. judicial procedures and 5. normative elements. This enables one to illustrate that a paradigm shift, which Th. Kuhn sees as an irrational conversion, as sees it, rests on a well-founded rational critique of particular elements of these commitments that nevertheless depends on a meta-level argumentation, going back to the world view and finally pleading for truth as a regulative idea. This is the meta-justification of alterations to the basic justification commitments.

Keywords: 
Stepin, justification, techno science, methodological commitments
References: 

 Bagozzi, Richard P. (2008): The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift. In: Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8.4, Article 3, 244-254.    http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol8/iss4/3 (10.08.2014)

Bijker, Wiebe E. / Pinch, Trevor J. (1987): The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit of Each Other. In: Bijker, Wiebe E.; Hughes, Thomas P.; Pinch, Trevor J. (Hg.): The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 17-50.

Carnap, Rudolf (1922): Der Raum. Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.

Davis, Fred (1985): A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems - theory and results, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology.

Elkana, Yehuda (1981): A Programmatic Attempt at an Anthropology of Knowledge, in: Everett Mendelsohn / Yehuda Elkana (Eds.): Sciences and Cultures. Sociology of Sciences, Vol. 5, Dordrecht: Reidel, p. 1-76.

Faulkner, Philip / Runde, Jochen (2012): The social, the material, and the ontology of non-material technological objects. http://w.lse.ac.uk/collections/informationSystems/newsAndEvents/2011even... (20.4.2012).

Feyerabend, Paul (1970): Against Method. Outline of an Anachist Theory of Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, p. 17-130.

Hempel, Carl Gustav / Oppenheim, Paul (1948): Studies in the Logic of Explanation, in: Philosophy of Science 15, 135-175.

Hübner, Kurt (1978): Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Vernunft, Freiburg i.Br.: Alber.

Kant, Immanuel (1786): Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. [Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Gesammelte Schriften (Akad. Ed.) IV. 467-565.]

Körner, Stephan (1970): Categorial Framework. Oxford: Blackwell.

Koschmann, Timoth (1996): Paradigm Shifts and Instructional Technology. In: In CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, p. 1–23. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=meded_books (8.8.2014)

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Needham, Joseph (1969): The Grand Titration; Science and Society in China and the West. London: Allen & Unwin.

Poser, Hans (2001): Wissenschaftstheorie. 2nd. ed. 2011, Stuttgart: Reclam.

Poser, Hans (2005): How to justify a justification. Comments on Alexandre Pechenkin’s paper on the Belusow-Zhabotinsky-Reaction. In: Knowledge and society, ed. Ilya Kassavin. Moscow: Kanon 2005, 197-202

Poser, Hans (2010): Scientific and technological rationality. In: Philosophy in the Dialogues of Culture - World Philosophy Day Moscow - St Petersburg Nov. 16-19, 2009. Materials. Moscow: Progress-Tradition 2010, p. 273-282.

Ropohl, Günter (1998): Wie die Technik zur Vernunft kommt. Beiträge zum Paradigmenwechsel in den Technikwissenschaften. Dresden: Facultas Verlag.

Stepin, Vyacheslav S. (2002): Civilization. Science. Culture. Karlsruhe/Moscow: Karlsruhe University / Russian Academy of Sciences.

Stepin, Vyacheslav S. (2005): Theoretical Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.

Wright, Georg Henrik von (1963): Practical Inference. In: The Philosophical Review 72, 159-179.

Wright, Georg Henrik von (1972): On So-Called Practical Inference. In: Acta Sociologica 15, 39-53

DOI: 
10.5840/eps201543131
Full Text: