ISSN 1811-833Х (Print)
ISSN 2311-7133 (Online)
This paper addresses the notion of a “theory of knowledge” from the perspective of sociological reflexivity. What becomes of the meaning of epistemology once the ontological status of knowledge is taken seriously, and its political dimensions impossible to ignore? If the knower is no longer an impersonal, universal subject, but always a situated and purposeful actor, what kind of epistemology do we need, and what social functions can we expect it to play? Sociological reflexivity embraces the historicity and situatedness of knowledge understood as a cultural product and a social practice. It therefore enables us to cope with the collapse of our absolute and universal epistemic foundations and frames of reference, and to redefine the existential and practical meanings of knowledge for social life. In so doing, it also gives political meaning to epistemology itself, understood as a sociological theory of knowledge, not a normative one. Reflexivity can be envisaged as both a “bending back” and a “bending forward” of knowledge as praxis. As a bending back of knowledge on itself, it entails a rigorous understanding of the social conditions of possibility of our thought and our values, and hence a critical assessment of what our worldviews and notions of truth owe to the social order in which we are inscribed. As a bending forward, it turns this objective understanding into an instrument of existential and social emancipation, by delineating the structural spaces of freedom and agency that allow for a meaningful and responsible scholarly practice.
Bernstein, R. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia : University of Philadelphia Press. 1983.
Bhaskar, R. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.2008.
Bhaskar, R. General Introduction // Critical Realism. Essential Readings; ed. by Margaret Archer, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson, and Alan Norrie. P. ix-xxiv. N.Y. : Routledge. 1998.
BonJour, L.The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge : Harvard University Press. 1985.
Bourdieu, P. Science de la science et réflexivité. P. : Raisons d’Agir. 2001.
Bourdieu, P. Homo Academicus. P. : Minuit. 1990.
Bourdieu, P. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge : Polity Press. 2004.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Jean-Claude Chamboredon, and Jean-Claude Passeron, 1983 – Le métier de sociologue: Préalables épistémologiques, 4th edition. Paris: Mouton. 1983.
Columbia University Press.1969.
Descartes, R. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. New Haven : Yale University Press. 1996.
Dewey, J. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge to Action. N.Y. : Minton, Balch. 1929.
Fuller, S. Social Epistemology. Indiana University Press. Gettier, Edmund, 1963 – Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis 23:121–3.1988.
Giddens, A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge : Polity Press.1994.
Gramsci A. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, edited and translated by Quentin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. L. : Lawrence and Wishart. 1971.
Hamati-Ataya I. The “Problem of Values” and International Relations Scholarship: From Applied Reflexivity to Reflexivism. International Studies Review 13(2):259–287.
Hegel, G.W.F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A.V. Miller. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 1977.
Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.1962.
Mannheim, K. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Harvest.1936.
Putnam, H. Reason, Truth, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1981.
Quine, W.V. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York:
Quine, W.V. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60:20–43. 1951.
Rorty, R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.1979.
Sellars, W. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind // Science, Perception and Reality. P. 127–196. L. : Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1963.
Zagzebski, L. What is Knowledge? // The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, e. by John Greco and Ernest Sosa. P. 92–116. Oxford : Blackwell. 1999.