Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Fenomen ekvivalentnyh opisaniy i problema fizicheskoy real’nosti
Marina Chernakova
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue number: 
No. 3 (Vol. 41)

The article is devoted to the philosophical analysis of the phenomenon of the coexistence of the empirically equivalent theories in physical knowledge. These theories equally well describe the empirical data in the same subject area, but differ from each other by the mathematical apparatus and/or postulated ontology of the fundamental objects. The choice between them is one of the most difficult challenges in achieving the objectively true knowledge about the studied region of reality. The article considers three types equivalent theories. The first type are temporarily equivalent theories - the emergence of new experimental data allows to choose one of them as the true and reject a false theory. Equivalent theories of the second type in the course of development of science find that one theory is applicable only in a limited area of reality, while the other can be extended to a new, more wide area of physical reality. Equivalent theories of the third type can not be evaluated in the foreseeable future by means of experiment on the validity/falsity. The empirical equivalence of the first and second types is temporary, and the equivalence of the third type is constant. We analyze the characteristics of solving of the problem of choosing between competing descriptions for all three types of empirically equivalent theories. Solutions can be found by: 1) the search of non-empirical criteria of the truth of the theory, 2) revision ability of the scientific theories give us the real picture of the non-observed physical reality, 3) revise the structure of physical reality in non-observed field of phenomena.

empirically equivalent theories, philosophy of physics, scientific realism, scientific antirealism

Cao T. The structural realism and the conceptual issues in quantum chromodynamics (Strukturnyy realizm i kontseptual'nye voprosy kvantovoy khromodinamiki). Epistemology and Philosophy of Science / Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2008. Т. VII, No. 3, Pp. 143-156.
Chudinov E.M. Priroda nauchnoy istiny (The nature of scientific truth). Moscow, 1977.
David R. Scientific Realism in the Age of String Theory. Physics and Philosophy. 2007. Vol. 11, P. 1-35.
de Broglie, L. The Revolution in Physics: A Non-mathematical Survey of Quanta. Greenwood Press Reprint, 1970.
Duhem P. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Moscow, 2001.
Fermi E. Lektsii po kvantovoy mekhanike (Lectures in quantum mechanics). Izhevsk, 2000.
French S. and Ladyman, J. Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure.. Synthese. 2003. Vol. 136, P. 31-56.
Fursov A.A. The evolution of scientific realism (Evolyutsiya nauchnogo realizma). Vestnik Voronezhskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2009. No. 1, Pp. 109-129.
Hacking I. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge, 1983.
Illarionov S.V. Teoriya poznaniya i filosofskie nauki (Theory of cognition and philosophical sciences). Moscow, 2001.
Maxwell G. The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities. Filosofiya nauki 2005. No. 1 (24), Pp. 20-48.
Pavlenko A.N. The stage of empirical incompatibility of a theory and ad hoc argumentation (Stadiya empiricheskoy nevesomosti teorii i ad hoc argumentatsiya). Filosofiya nauki. 1998. Vol 4.
Popper K. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, 1972.
Puankare A. O nauke. Moscow, 1983.
Sadberi A. Kvantovaya mekhanika i fizika chastits. Moscow, 1989.
Vladimirov Yu.S. Metafizika (Metaphysics). Moscow, 2002.
Weinberg S. Cosmology. Oxford, 2008.

Full Text: