THE CHOICE OF INTERPRETATION AS A PROBLEM OF SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY

Publication Type:

Language:

Transliteration of original Title: 
Vybor interpretacii kak problema social'noj èpistomologii
Author(s): 
Vladimir Porus
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Issue number: 
No. 1 (Vol. 31)
Pages: 
18-35
Abstract: 

Social epistemology is a complex of attempts to give philosophical sense to sociological researches of cognitive processes in their social context. These attempts are carried out through a competition of philosophical interpretations. The choice of interpretation is dictated by aspiration to bring valuable orientations of science into accord with the demands that are put forth by the changeable cultural-historical environment. R. Merton’s «normative ethos of scientists» is considered as an illustration of this thesis. 

Keywords: 
Social epistemology, sociology of science, philosophy of science, culture, values, ethos, interpretation, truth
References: 

Mamčur E.A. Ešče raz o predmete social'noj èpistemologii. Èpistemologija i filosofija nauki. 2010. T. XXIV, № 2.

Kasavin I.T. Social'naja èpistemologija: k istorii i postanovke problemy. Social'naja èpistemologija. Idei, metody, programmy; pod red. I.T. Kasavina. M., 2010.

Merton R. The Institutional Imperatives of Science. Sociology of Science; ed/by B. Barnes. L., 1972.

Merton R. Social'naja teorija i social'naja struktura. M., 2006.

Mirskaja E.Z. Ètos nauki: ideal'nye reguljativy i povsednevnye realii. Ètos nauki. M., 2008.

Demina N.V. Mertonovskaja koncepcija ètosa nauki: v poiskax social'noj geometrii norm. Ètos nauki. M., 2008.

Lakatos I. Fal'sifikacija i metodologija naučno-issledovatel'skix programm. I. Lakatos. Izbrannye proizvedenija po filosofii i metodologii nauki. M., 2008.

Mikešina L.A. Specifika filosofskoj interpretacii. Voprosy filosofii. 1999. № 11.

Mikešina L.A. Interpretacija kak fundamental'naja operacija poznanija. Èpistemologija i filosofija nauki. 2008. T. XVIII, № 3.

Rozov M.A. Normativnaja struktura nauki. Ètos nauki. M., 2008.

Stepin V.S., Goroxov V.G., Rozov M.A. Filosofija nauki i texniki. M., 1996.

Flek L. Vozniknovenie i razvitie naučnogo fakta. Vvedenie v teoriju stilja myšlenija i myslitel'nogo kollektiva. M., 1999.

Kuhn T. The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research. Scientific Change; ed. by A. Crombie. L., 1963.

Kuhn T. Second Thoughts on Paradigms. The Structure of Scientific Theories; ed. by F. Suppe. Urbana, 1974.

Barber B. Science and the Social Order (with a foreword by R.K. Merton). Glencoe, 1952.

Popper K. Normal'naja nauka i opasnosti, svjazannye s nej. T. Kun. Struktura naučnyx revoljucij. M., 2001.

Xjubner K. Istina mifa. M., 1996.

Xjubner K. Progress ot mifa čerez logos k nauke kak teoretiko-poznavatel'naja problema. Razum i èkzistencija. Analiz naučnyx i vnenaučnyx form myšlenija. SPb., 1999.

Deppert V. Mifičeskie formy myšlenija v nauke na primere ponjatij prostranstva, vremeni i zakona prirody. Razum i èkzistencija. SPb., 1999.

Merton R. The Ambivalence of Scientists. Science and Society. Chicago, 1965.

Merton R. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science. 1968. Vol. 159.

Konnov V.I. Principy naučnogo samoupravlenija v sovremennoj sociologii nauki. Filosofskie nauki. 2007. № 4.

Barnes S., Dolby R. The Scientific Ethos: a Deviant Viewpount. Archives Européennes de Sociologie. P. Vol. 11, № 1.

Griffith B., Mullins N. Coherent Social Groups in Scientific change. Science. 1972. Vol, 77.

Kollinz R., Restivo S. Piraty i politiki v matematike. Otečestvennye zapiski. 2002. № 7.

Mitroff I. The Subjective Side of Science. A Psychological inquiry into the Psychology of the Appolo Moon Scientists. Amsterdam, 1974.

Fuller S. Kuhn vs Popper. Revolutions in Science. Cambridge, 2003.

Fuller S. Science. Buckingham, 1997.

Allaxverdjan A.G., Moškova G.Ju., Jurevič A.V., Jaroševskij M.G. Psixologija nauki. M., 1998.

Porus V.N. Paradoksal'naja racional'nosti. Racional'nost' na pereput'e. Kn. 1. M., 1999.

Full Text: