Publication Type:


Transliteration of original Title: 
Jum i fiziki
Rom Harre
Georgetown University
Issue number: 
No. 2 (Vol. 32)

The author highlights certain features of the writings of David Hume on causal necessity and causal powers in the light of the leading concepts of the science of his time. This approach contrasts with the recent extensive literature on Hume’s philosophy in which the local scientific background to his two great works, the Treatise and the Enquiry is almost completely ignored. It is argued that we cannot really understand the depths of Hume’s account of causality without attending to the historical circumstances in which he came to formulate it. In particular we need to understand the explicit and implicit causal concepts in the writings of his contemporaries, whose works he must surely either have known or have known.

Hume, causality, power, physics

Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature. Glasgow, 1962.

Hume D. An Enquiry Concerning the Human Understanding. Oxford, 1971.

Rosenberg A. Hume and Philosophy of Science. The Cambridge Companion to Hume ; D.F. Norton (ed.). Cambridge. P. 71–77.

Stroud B., Hume L.: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.

Gilbert W. De Magnete. L., 1600.

Shirley J.W. Thomas Harriot: A Biography. Oxford, 1983.

Greene R. On the Expancive and Contractive Forces. L., 1727.

Hume D. History of England. Edinburg, 1792. Vol. VIII. P. 334.

Flew A.G.N. Hume's Philosophy of Belief. L., 1961.

Locke J. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. L. : Dent. 1972.

Maclaurin C. An Account of Sir Isaac Newton's Discoveries. L., 1748.

Pears D. Hume's System. Oxford, 1990.

Einstein A. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik. 1905. № 17. P. 891-921.

Eddington A. Fundamental Theory. Cambridge, 1965.

Full Text: